What is the solution of x*exp(-x)=1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Odyssey
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation x*exp(-x)=1 does not have a solution. The discussion reveals that after taking the natural logarithm, the equation simplifies to ln(x) - x = 0. The only candidate for a solution, x=1, satisfies the equation but does not yield equality when substituted back into the original equation. Participants suggest using graphical methods to demonstrate the lack of intersection between the two sides of the equation, reinforcing the conclusion that no solution exists.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with natural logarithms and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically derivatives
  • Graphing techniques for visualizing equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exponential functions and their inverses
  • Learn about the behavior of the function f(x) = ln(x) - x
  • Explore graphical methods for solving equations
  • Investigate the implications of negative exponents in algebraic expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians interested in solving transcendental equations, and educators looking for teaching methods related to exponential and logarithmic functions.

Odyssey
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the solution of the equation x*exp(-x)=1?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried taking the ln of both sides...and I got
ln(x*exp(-x))=ln(1)
ln(x)-ln(exp(x))=ln(1)
ln(x)-x=ln(1)

Then I don't know what to do next...am I on the right track at least?

Thanks for the help! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xe^{-x}=1

Use what you know about negative exponents to rewrite this problem in a more simple form. Where is this problem from? You may need to show that there is no solution rather than finding the solution.
 
futurebird is right. You may have to show it doesn't have a solution. Clearly x>0 is the only possibility. So you got ln(x)-x=ln(1)=0. Take f(x)=ln(x)-x. Look at f'(x) to figure out where it has a max/min etc. Can it ever be zero?
 
x=1 works.

Ooh- my bad- misread the question. It doesn't have a solution.
 
christianjb said:
x=1 works.

You scared me for a moment there!


An easy way to see that there is so solution is to first simplify then graph both sides of the equation by setting them equal to y.
 
Graphing them both and showing the don't intersect is not really the most rigorous proof...

Use Dick's method in post 3.
 
ahhhh...thanks guys! Why didnt I think of that? =\
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K