What is the speed of a falling bolt in an upward-moving elevator?

AI Thread Summary
An elevator moving upward at 2.50 m/s has a bolt that falls from the ceiling, and the speed of the bolt as observed from a stationary point outside the elevator is 5.17 m/s. The observer sees the bolt initially moving upward at 2.5 m/s before it accelerates downward due to gravity. The time taken for the bolt to fall to the elevator floor is calculated to be approximately 0.782 seconds. To find the distance traveled by the bolt, it is treated as a projectile with an initial upward velocity, leading to the use of kinematic equations. The discussion highlights the confusion regarding whether to calculate total distance or displacement, emphasizing the importance of understanding the problem's context.
enderAM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An elevator is moving upward at a constant speed of 2.50 {\rm{ m/s}}. A bolt in the elevator ceiling 3.00 {\rm m} above the elevator floor works loose and falls.

(Part C) What is the speed of the bolt according to an observer standing on one of the floor landings of the building?

(Part D) According to the observer in part C, what distance did the bolt travel between the ceiling and the floor of the elevator?

Homework Equations


Not sure if there really are any special equations just some kinematic equations
h = 1/2gt^2
v_y = gt

The Attempt at a Solution



I got part C correct (the question is pasted on top), which yielded an answer of 5.17 m/s. I just don't what to do for part D.

I take the velocity 5.17m/s and plug it into v_y = gt to get the time and then plug that in the equation for height (given above). I come out with 1.36 m but it doesn't look right to me. Just need someone to check my work because I don't have many attempts left for the problem (its for masteringphysics).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not really sure what the question is asking (total distance or just displacement from starting point?) and you seem to be leaving out a detail (what time interval are we looking at? the time from when it shakes loose to when it hits the elevator floor?) but the most obvious way that I see to solve the problem is to treat the bolt as a projectile with an initial upward velocity of 2.5 m/s

That would make the equation for height h = -1/2 g*t^2 + v_0*t + h_0
 
JaWiB said:
I'm not really sure what the question is asking (total distance or just displacement from starting point?) and you seem to be leaving out a detail (what time interval are we looking at? the time from when it shakes loose to when it hits the elevator floor?) but the most obvious way that I see to solve the problem is to treat the bolt as a projectile with an initial upward velocity of 2.5 m/s

That would make the equation for height h = -1/2 g*t^2 + v_0*t + h_0

Well in the first part of the problem (not shown) i found that the time for the bolt to fall to the floor is .782 seconds and according to an observer in the elevator the velocity would be 7.67 m/s (part 2). I don't see how an initial velocity of 2.5 m/s would fit into this problem.
 
To an observer outside the elevator, the bolt is traveling at 2.5 m/s upward with the elevator when it begins falling, and afterward its velocity changes by 9.8 m/s^2. The problem is no different from firing a projectile upward at 2.5 m/s
 
Thanks a lot man it helped. Such an easy problem too T.T
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
14K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
8K
Back
Top