Relative Motion - Elevator Problem

In summary, a man standing in a lift moving upwards with a speed of 10 m/s drops a coin from a height of 4.9 m and wants to know how long it takes for the coin to reach the floor, given that g=9.8 m/s^2. The initial speed of the coin is unknown. The equations x = 0.5*g*t^2 and x = ut + 0.5*g*t^2 are used to solve the problem from the reference frames of both the elevator and the ground. However, when considering the ground as the reference frame, the upwards initial velocity of 10 m/s must be used in the equation offset by g
  • #1
LHC_23
14
0

Homework Statement


A lift in which a man is standing is moving upwards with a speed 10 m/s. The man drops a coin from a height of
4.9 m and if g = 9.8 m/s2 - then after what time does the coin reach the floor.

Homework Equations


x = 0.5*g*t2

x = ut + 0.5*g*t2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know this is quite a simple problem - my point is, why does an observer inside the elevator observe
the coin touching the floor at t = 1s while the observer on the ground would observe the coin touching
the floor at t = sqrt(2) - 1 s ?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What is the initial speed of the coin?
 
  • #3
I know this is quite a simple problem - my point is, why does an observer inside the elevator observe
the coin touching the floor at t = 1s while the observer on the ground would observe the coin touching
the floor at t = sqrt(2) - 1 s ?
Apparently it isn't that simple, because the answer to your question is : Neither nor !

Show your workings and we'll guide you
 
  • #4
Edit: reply removed, was posted at the same time as others, no need for a chorus :)
 
  • #5
Well, here is what I what I thought :

From the reference frame of the elevator - The initial velocity of the coin must be 0 - since they were both moving upwards with 10 m/s. Then I applied the equation
x = 0.5*g*t2 - and plugging in x=4.9 m and g = 9.8 m/s2 - I got t = 1 s.

From the reference frame of the ground - I'm not really sure now about how I got that answer - must have been a mistake I guess. But, could someone tell me how I should approach the problem from the viewpoint of the ground ?
 
  • #6
ArkaSengupta said:
From the reference frame of the ground - I'm not really sure now about how I got that answer - must have been a mistake I guess. But, could someone tell me how I should approach the problem from the viewpoint of the ground ?
Start by answering my question in post#2.
 
  • #7
@haruspex - From the reference frame of ground, it should be 10 m/s upward.
 
  • #8
ArkaSengupta said:
@haruspex - From the reference frame of ground, it should be 10 m/s upward.
Ok. If it takes time t to hit the floor of the elevator, how far will it have traveled relative to the ground?
 
  • #9
It would have traveled x = -10t + 4.9t2
 
Last edited:
  • #10
You consider the upwards velocity only if you let the coin drop outside the elevator There is no time difference within the elevator for observers inside or out
 
  • #11
@wintjc But then, I don't see the difference between dropping it outside or inside - if I am in the reference frame of the ground, do I ?
 
  • #12
ArkaSengupta said:
It would have traveled x = -10t + 4.9t2
Ok, and what is x in terms of the height at which it was dropped, given the elevator's motion.
 
  • #13
I think I didn't really get your question - How do I express x in terms of "the height at which it was dropped, given the elevator's motion" ?

Or rather : I don't know how to go about it - given my understanding of your question.

EDIT : I still don't get how things would work from the ground frame - Could you show me how you would go about solving the problem from the ground frame ?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
ArkaSengupta said:
I think I didn't really get your question - How do I express x in terms of "the height at which it was dropped, given the elevator's motion" ?

Or rather : I don't know how to go about it - given my understanding of your question.
You are given the height from the elevator floor at which it was dropped, yes? We have set t as the time it takes to hit the floor, and x as the distance it moves (relative to ground) in the process. How far has the elevator floor moved in time t?
[One thing worries me - 4.9 m is a very tall elevator cage.]
 
  • #15
Well, the elevator floor would have moved a distance 10t.

[ :D , I hadn't noticed that - I was just assuming a person (had to be a giant) took a penny out from his pocket and dropped it by mistake - I didn't assume the height of the elevator cage to be 4.9 m - Though I think that would represent a practical situation much better.]
 
  • #16
If the floor is the ground and the height off the floor is 4.9 m then use the upwards initial velocity in the equation offset by g. And solve If the floor is the elevator floor then it's just a 4.9 m drop

There us no time difference unless you apply two different scenarios for two observers. Ie doing two different problems. You are making this more complex than it is
 
  • #17
wintjc said:
If the floor is the ground and the height off the floor is 4.9 m then use the upwards initial velocity in the equation offset by g. And solve If the floor is the elevator floor then it's just a 4.9 m drop

There us no time difference unless you apply two different scenarios for two observers. Ie doing two different problems. You are making this more complex than it is
My reading of the thread is that LHC understands that, but was puzzled to get different results by the two methods.
 
  • #18
I 'm following this thread with a sense of puzzlement: 4.9 m high is nonsense for an elevator cage. My reading for this exercise is: the coin falls from 4.9 m high with an initial upward speed of 10 m/s, so it takes longer than 1 s to reach the floor.

But then, an upward speed of 10 m/s at a distance 4.9 m above the floor requires an equally nonsensical acceleration if you start from zero. Perhaps the thing took off from the -5th floor in a deep underground parking garage o0) ?

As an exercise, I find it of miserable quality: 4.9 m, 10 m/s ? And: Dropping things out of an elevator cage is generally impossible and therefore hard to imagine.
 
  • #19
BvU said:
I 'm following this thread with a sense of puzzlement: 4.9 m high is nonsense for an elevator cage. My reading for this exercise is: the coin falls from 4.9 m high with an initial upward speed of 10 m/s, so it takes longer than 1 s to reach the floor.

But then, an upward speed of 10 m/s at a distance 4.9 m above the floor requires an equally nonsensical acceleration if you start from zero. Perhaps the thing took off from the -5th floor in a deep underground parking garage o0) ?

As an exercise, I find it of miserable quality: 4.9 m, 10 m/s ? And: Dropping things out of an elevator cage is generally impossible and therefore hard to imagine.
I also wondered whether 'floor' meant ground, rather than the floor of the cage. Or maybe 4.9m is a typo for 0.49 m.
 

1. What is relative motion in an elevator problem?

Relative motion in an elevator problem refers to the movement of objects or people inside an elevator as it moves up or down. It is the motion relative to the elevator itself, rather than the motion relative to the ground or other external reference point.

2. How does relative motion affect the perception of weight in an elevator?

Relative motion can affect the perception of weight in an elevator, as the force of gravity is still acting on objects or people inside the elevator. As the elevator accelerates, the perceived weight may change due to the acceleration of the elevator. For example, when the elevator is moving upwards, the perceived weight may feel lighter, and when the elevator is moving downwards, the perceived weight may feel heavier.

3. Why is it important to consider relative motion in an elevator problem?

It is important to consider relative motion in an elevator problem because it can impact the forces acting on objects or people inside the elevator. This can affect the safety and comfort of those inside the elevator, as well as the overall mechanics of the elevator itself.

4. How does relative motion affect the energy consumption of an elevator?

Relative motion can affect the energy consumption of an elevator, as the elevator must use energy to overcome the forces of gravity and acceleration. When the elevator is moving upwards, more energy is required to lift the elevator and its contents against the force of gravity. When the elevator is moving downwards, less energy is required as gravity is assisting in the movement.

5. How can relative motion be calculated in an elevator problem?

Relative motion in an elevator problem can be calculated using principles of Newton's laws of motion and kinematics. This involves considering the forces acting on objects or people inside the elevator, as well as the acceleration and velocity of the elevator. Calculations can be made using equations such as F=ma and kinematic equations such as v=at.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
962
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
940
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
855
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
Back
Top