Relative Motion - Elevator Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a scenario where a man drops a coin from a height of 4.9 m while standing in an upward-moving elevator with a speed of 10 m/s. The discussion centers around the differing observations of the time it takes for the coin to reach the floor from the perspectives of an observer inside the elevator and one on the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the initial speed of the coin and its implications from different reference frames. Questions arise about the calculations leading to the observed times for the coin to hit the floor from both the elevator and ground perspectives.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem from different frames of reference, while others express confusion about the initial conditions and the implications of the height of the elevator. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the physical setup and the assumptions involved.

Contextual Notes

There are concerns about the practicality of the problem, particularly regarding the height of 4.9 m for an elevator and the initial conditions of the coin's drop. Some participants question whether the problem is well-posed or if it contains errors in its assumptions.

LHC_23
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A lift in which a man is standing is moving upwards with a speed 10 m/s. The man drops a coin from a height of
4.9 m and if g = 9.8 m/s2 - then after what time does the coin reach the floor.

Homework Equations


x = 0.5*g*t2

x = ut + 0.5*g*t2

The Attempt at a Solution


I know this is quite a simple problem - my point is, why does an observer inside the elevator observe
the coin touching the floor at t = 1s while the observer on the ground would observe the coin touching
the floor at t = sqrt(2) - 1 s ?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the initial speed of the coin?
 
I know this is quite a simple problem - my point is, why does an observer inside the elevator observe
the coin touching the floor at t = 1s while the observer on the ground would observe the coin touching
the floor at t = sqrt(2) - 1 s ?
Apparently it isn't that simple, because the answer to your question is : Neither nor !

Show your workings and we'll guide you
 
Edit: reply removed, was posted at the same time as others, no need for a chorus :)
 
Well, here is what I what I thought :

From the reference frame of the elevator - The initial velocity of the coin must be 0 - since they were both moving upwards with 10 m/s. Then I applied the equation
x = 0.5*g*t2 - and plugging in x=4.9 m and g = 9.8 m/s2 - I got t = 1 s.

From the reference frame of the ground - I'm not really sure now about how I got that answer - must have been a mistake I guess. But, could someone tell me how I should approach the problem from the viewpoint of the ground ?
 
ArkaSengupta said:
From the reference frame of the ground - I'm not really sure now about how I got that answer - must have been a mistake I guess. But, could someone tell me how I should approach the problem from the viewpoint of the ground ?
Start by answering my question in post#2.
 
@haruspex - From the reference frame of ground, it should be 10 m/s upward.
 
ArkaSengupta said:
@haruspex - From the reference frame of ground, it should be 10 m/s upward.
Ok. If it takes time t to hit the floor of the elevator, how far will it have traveled relative to the ground?
 
It would have traveled x = -10t + 4.9t2
 
Last edited:
  • #10
You consider the upwards velocity only if you let the coin drop outside the elevator There is no time difference within the elevator for observers inside or out
 
  • #11
@wintjc But then, I don't see the difference between dropping it outside or inside - if I am in the reference frame of the ground, do I ?
 
  • #12
ArkaSengupta said:
It would have traveled x = -10t + 4.9t2
Ok, and what is x in terms of the height at which it was dropped, given the elevator's motion.
 
  • #13
I think I didn't really get your question - How do I express x in terms of "the height at which it was dropped, given the elevator's motion" ?

Or rather : I don't know how to go about it - given my understanding of your question.

EDIT : I still don't get how things would work from the ground frame - Could you show me how you would go about solving the problem from the ground frame ?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
ArkaSengupta said:
I think I didn't really get your question - How do I express x in terms of "the height at which it was dropped, given the elevator's motion" ?

Or rather : I don't know how to go about it - given my understanding of your question.
You are given the height from the elevator floor at which it was dropped, yes? We have set t as the time it takes to hit the floor, and x as the distance it moves (relative to ground) in the process. How far has the elevator floor moved in time t?
[One thing worries me - 4.9 m is a very tall elevator cage.]
 
  • #15
Well, the elevator floor would have moved a distance 10t.

[ :D , I hadn't noticed that - I was just assuming a person (had to be a giant) took a penny out from his pocket and dropped it by mistake - I didn't assume the height of the elevator cage to be 4.9 m - Though I think that would represent a practical situation much better.]
 
  • #16
If the floor is the ground and the height off the floor is 4.9 m then use the upwards initial velocity in the equation offset by g. And solve If the floor is the elevator floor then it's just a 4.9 m drop

There us no time difference unless you apply two different scenarios for two observers. Ie doing two different problems. You are making this more complex than it is
 
  • #17
wintjc said:
If the floor is the ground and the height off the floor is 4.9 m then use the upwards initial velocity in the equation offset by g. And solve If the floor is the elevator floor then it's just a 4.9 m drop

There us no time difference unless you apply two different scenarios for two observers. Ie doing two different problems. You are making this more complex than it is
My reading of the thread is that LHC understands that, but was puzzled to get different results by the two methods.
 
  • #18
I 'm following this thread with a sense of puzzlement: 4.9 m high is nonsense for an elevator cage. My reading for this exercise is: the coin falls from 4.9 m high with an initial upward speed of 10 m/s, so it takes longer than 1 s to reach the floor.

But then, an upward speed of 10 m/s at a distance 4.9 m above the floor requires an equally nonsensical acceleration if you start from zero. Perhaps the thing took off from the -5th floor in a deep underground parking garage o0) ?

As an exercise, I find it of miserable quality: 4.9 m, 10 m/s ? And: Dropping things out of an elevator cage is generally impossible and therefore hard to imagine.
 
  • #19
BvU said:
I 'm following this thread with a sense of puzzlement: 4.9 m high is nonsense for an elevator cage. My reading for this exercise is: the coin falls from 4.9 m high with an initial upward speed of 10 m/s, so it takes longer than 1 s to reach the floor.

But then, an upward speed of 10 m/s at a distance 4.9 m above the floor requires an equally nonsensical acceleration if you start from zero. Perhaps the thing took off from the -5th floor in a deep underground parking garage o0) ?

As an exercise, I find it of miserable quality: 4.9 m, 10 m/s ? And: Dropping things out of an elevator cage is generally impossible and therefore hard to imagine.
I also wondered whether 'floor' meant ground, rather than the floor of the cage. Or maybe 4.9m is a typo for 0.49 m.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K