What is the spring constant for a uniformly loaded clamped beam?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the spring constant for a uniformly loaded clamped beam. Participants explore different formulations and interpretations of the spring constant in relation to beam deflection under various loading conditions, including both uniformly distributed loads and point loads.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for the spring constant of a clamped beam under a central point load, stating k = 192EI/L^3, and seeks the equivalent for a uniformly distributed load.
  • Another participant questions the term "spring constant," suggesting the quoted formula pertains to midspan deflection rather than stiffness.
  • A different participant argues that the spring constant has units of N/m, indicating it represents stiffness rather than deflection.
  • One participant proposes a formula for the uniformly loaded beam as k = 384EI/L^3, noting it should be multiplied by the total load.
  • Another participant requests a source for the proposed formula, indicating they are preparing a calculation document.
  • A participant suggests solving the differential equation governing the beam's deflection, providing a specific equation and boundary conditions.
  • One participant confirms the correctness of the proposed formula after working through the calculations.
  • Another participant introduces a different spring coefficient derived from a finite element method (FEM) analysis, presenting k = 24EI/L^3.
  • A participant challenges the derivation of the FEM result, indicating it is incomplete and suggesting a correction to the power in the formula.
  • One participant acknowledges an oversight in their earlier calculations and clarifies the importance of using correct units.
  • Another participant notes that they typically work in deflection terms rather than spring constants, suggesting a difference in perspective rather than a disagreement on the formulas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition and calculation of the spring constant for a uniformly loaded clamped beam. Multiple competing formulas are presented, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding which is the most appropriate or accurate.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made in the derivations, the dependence on specific boundary conditions, and the potential for errors in unit calculations. The discussion reflects a range of approaches to the problem without reaching a consensus.

sbarrett5432
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know the spring constant for a clamped/fixed beam with length L that is uniformly loaded? I know the spring constant for a clamped beam that is centrally load by a point load is

k= 192EI/L^3

I know for a uniformly distributed is different.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No idea what you mean by spring constant.

The formula you have quoted is for the midspan deflection of a beam with fully contrained end supports and a central point load.
 
well if you work out the units to what i posted you will see that the k has units of N/m, aka stiffness (not deflection of units 'm')

That is the stiffness of the beam, or how much force it takes to deflect the beam 1 unit of length depending on what set of units are used.
 
I suppose what you are looking for is

k= 384EI/L^3

Bearing in mind that this is to be multiplied by the total load =wL, as opposed to W in the case of the point load.
 
Cool! thanks.

not to make it seem like I don't believe you, because I do and that constant looks familiar. but I'm preparing a calculation document for a company. Do you happen to have the source of that info?
 
Feel free to solve the differential equation for yourself

EI\delta = - \frac{{wL{x^3}}}{{12}} + \frac{{M{x^2}}}{2} + \frac{{w{x^4}}}{{24}} + Ax + B

You have the usual boundary conditions ie the deflections and their first derivatives are zero at the supports and the first derivative is also zero at the centre.

These lead to A = B = 0 and M (midspan) is given by
M = \frac{{w{L^2}}}{{24}}
 
I worked it out and you were spot on. Thanks a bunch!
 
Here's another question:

I was doing this problem via FEM by hand and came out with another spring coefficient. It's in the attachment, check it out tell me what you think.


the spring constant k is found in the very last equation and is the first term to the left of the equal sign that is being multiplied by U-21. it's 24EI/L^3
 

Attachments

Where did this come from?
It sems to be only part of the story. You have displayed the equivalent nodal force calculation for a beam element, but it is unfinished.

If we remember that Le = L/2 and substitute

Then

{U_{21}} = - \frac{w}{{24EI}}{\left( {\frac{L}{2}} \right)^4}

for unit load w = 1 and U21 = 1/k

So

k = \frac{1}{{{U_{21\left( {w = 1} \right)}}}} = - \frac{{384EI}}{{{L^4}}}

I apologise for the power error in my earlier rendition I copy & pasted your formula and forgot to change the power.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
truth is, its a confidential document which is why only some of the story is shown. I went on the assumption that the information given would be enough for you to understand.

If you are going to use unit load of 1 you still have to use the units.

since you didnt, the units are wrong for the stiffness, k. your power was right before.

but like a dummy i now see i overlooked where the 382 came from because i forgot to evaluate at L/2
 
  • #11
The formulae are the same.
I am just used to working in deflection terms not spring constants.

Glad we got there in the end.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
61
Views
8K
Replies
33
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K