MHB What Is the Structure of Modules Over Polynomial Rings?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $R$ be a commutative ring with unit.

We consider the polynomial ring $R=\mathbb{R}[t]$ and the $R$-module $M=\mathbb{R}^3$, where $a\cdot x$ ( $a\in R,x\in M$ ) is defined as usual if $a\in \mathbb{R}$, and $a\cdot x=(x_1, 0, 0)$ if $a=t, x=(x_1, x_2, x_3)$.

From the structure theorem for finitely generated $R$-module there is a list $p_1, p_2, \dots , p_n$ irreducible of $R$ and a list $k_1, k_2, \dots , k_n$ positive integers such that $$M\cong R/\langle p_1^{k_1}\rangle \oplus \dots \oplus R/\langle p_n^{k_n}\rangle$$

How can we find these lists? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is similar to your last problem, although it may not appear so.

To whit, $t$ acts upon $v \in \Bbb R^3$ as the linear transformation:

$T(x,y,z) = (x,0,0)$.

Again, $T$ here satisfies the polynomial $t^2 - t$, and this is its minimal polynomial, but its characteristic polynomial is $t^2(t - 1)$.

We can immediately decompose $\Bbb R^3$ into the eigenspace decomposition:

$\Bbb R^3 = E_0 \oplus E_1$ where $E_0 = \text{ker }T$, and $E_1 = \{(a,0,0): a \in \Bbb R\}$.

It is clear that $E_1$ corresponds to $\Bbb R[t]/\langle t-1\rangle$ since

$(t - 1)\cdot (x,y,z) = t\cdot (x,y,z) - (x,y,z) = (x,0,0) - (x,y,z) = (0,-y,-z)$

so that $t - 1$ annihilates $(x,y,z)$ if and only if $y = z = 0$. Since $t - 1$ is irreducible, we have found one of the factors on our list.

Now you know that $E_0$ corresponds to the annihilator of the subspace $W = \{(0,b,c): b,c \in \Bbb R\} \cong \Bbb R^2$.

What possible irreducible factors of $t^2(t-1)$ are there that annihilate this subspace?
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K