What is the tension in a rope supporting multiple weights using a pulley system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brake4country
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Multiple Pulleys
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a pulley system with a 100 kg man and a 50 kg mass, where the tension in the rope is to be determined. The scenario includes a frictionless surface and the dynamics of multiple weights influencing the tension in the rope.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the setup of equations related to the forces acting on the man and the block, questioning how to properly account for the different masses involved.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct approach to use the mass of the block for calculating tension, while others have expressed agreement on the value of acceleration. There is an ongoing exploration of how to correctly label and apply the masses in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the use of different masses in the equations and the implications of the frictionless surface on the forces at play.

brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


A 100 kg man dangles a 50 kg mass from the end of a rope. If he stands on a frictionless surface and hangs the mass over a cliff with a pulley, the tension in the rope will be:
(A) 250 N
(B) 333 N
(C) 500 N
(D) 667 N

The answer is B but I am having a difficult time setting this one up.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, so we know that for the man, T = ma because he is on a frictionless surface and the block is mg = T+ma.
Some others have posted this problem on this site but I need clarification for the second equation listed above. I cannot combine these equations because the masses are different. So, what I did was alter the equations as

man: T=2ma
block: mg = T+ma

substituting gives me: mg = 2ma +ma
therefore, g = 3a and a = 3.33 m/s

But when I go back to my "altered" equations to solve for T, I get 667 N which is wrong. Anyone know what I am doing wrong here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if the acceleration on the man is 3.33 m/s, and the only force acting on him is the tension, then you that the force of tension is his mass times that acceleration. I think the issue you had was that you plugged it back into your equation T=2ma but you used the mass for the man. At that point 2m for m block = m of the man. So when you plug it back, make sure you use the block's mass. T = 2(50)(3.33) which is B.

When you are dealing with multiple masses (or any of the same variables for that matter), be clear to label them so that you do not mix them up.
 
I agree with your value for a. Please post your working from that point.
 
Ok, conceptually that makes sense. I wouldn't be using the man's mass because at that point when he is sliding, only the force due to gravity is acting on the block.
 
haruspex said:
I agree with your value for a. Please post your working from that point.
Ok, so using the man's mass would be erroneous. To find the tension, I would have to use the mass of the block: T = 2ma = 2(50)(3.33) = 333N. The way I am thinking about this problem is that the tension is created by the object that is being affected by gravity.
 
brake4country said:
Ok, so using the man's mass would be erroneous. To find the tension, I would have to use the mass of the block: T = 2ma = 2(50)(3.33) = 333N. The way I am thinking about this problem is that the tension is created by the object that is being affected by gravity.
Using the man's mass is ok, but it seems you put m=100kg instead of m=50kg, the man's mass being 2m.
 
Oh got it hello! Thank you! That was tricky.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K