What is the Tensor Analog of the Poincare Lemma?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ancient_Nomad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analog Poincare Tensor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The tensor analog of the Poincaré Lemma states that for a vector field \( A \) on a manifold with a Lorentzian metric, if \( \nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu} = 0 \), there exists an anti-symmetric tensor \( B \) such that \( \nabla_{\nu} B^{\mu \nu} = A^{\mu} \). This follows from the relationship between the divergence of a vector field and the co-differential of its corresponding one-form. The Poincaré Lemma for the co-differential asserts that every co-closed form is co-exact, applicable locally on manifolds with non-vanishing first Betti number. The Hodge decomposition further clarifies that any \( n \)-form can be expressed in terms of exact, co-exact, and harmonic forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential forms and their properties
  • Familiarity with covariant derivatives and metrics in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of the Hodge decomposition theorem
  • Concept of Betti numbers in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the Poincaré Lemma for co-differentials
  • Explore the implications of the Hodge decomposition theorem in Riemannian geometry
  • Learn about the properties of anti-symmetric tensors in the context of differential geometry
  • Investigate the significance of Betti numbers in the study of manifold topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in differential geometry, topology, and theoretical physics, particularly those interested in the applications of the Poincaré Lemma and tensor analysis.

Ancient_Nomad
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I know that there is a result that corresponding to a closed p-form α, I can find a p-1 form β,
such that dβ = α.

I wanted to ask, what the tensorial analog of this would be. I mean would it be right to say that on a manifold with a lorentzian metric,

If I have a vector field A, such that

\nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu} = 0

then there exists an anti-symmetric tensor B such that,

\nabla_{\nu} B^{\mu \nu} = A^{\mu}

where \nabla is the covariant derivative comaptible with the metric
(So that covariant derivative of the metric is zero)

Also, if possible, please tell me where I can find the proof of the correct statement.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you are looking for is a Poincare Lemma for the co-differential, if I get this right. So the problem is not so much about using vector fields or forms, when you have a metric available (as you say) to switch between them.

Essentially the divergence \mathrm{div}(A) of a vector field A is the co-differential \delta(A^{\flat}) of its corresponding one-form A^{\flat}. As the co-differential is also nil-potent as is the exterior derivative, there is of course also a Poincare Lemma for the co-differential. Something like: Every co-closed form is co-exact.

But note that these statement generally only hold locally on manifolds with non-vanishing first Betti number.
 
On any Riemannian manifold one has the Hodge decomposition, which states that any n-form \varphi_n can be written

\varphi_n = d \alpha_{n-1} + \delta \beta_{n+1} + \gamma_n
for some \alpha_{n-1}, \beta_{n+1}, \gamma_n (the subscript indicates the degree of the form), where \delta is the co-differential, and \gamma_n is harmonic (i.e. d \gamma_n = \delta \gamma_n = 0).

If we assume that \varphi_n is co-closed, then

\delta \varphi_n = 0 = \delta d \alpha_{n-1} + 0 + 0
hence we must have \alpha_{n-1} = 0. If the n-th Betti number is zero, then we must also have \gamma_n = 0, and in this case \varphi_n can be written

\varphi_n = \delta \beta_{n+1}
This statement is always true locally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K