rewebster
- 877
- 2
Andre said:I used to airbrush it the past:
One of the few remaining:
snatched up by admirers?
Andre said:I used to airbrush it the past:
One of the few remaining:
baywax said:Nice Andre, very challenging work you were doing. Technicals of airbrushing plus the anatomy and understanding of the animal. Robert Bateman is living near here and his work has blossomed well over the years. Check out his portraits of the worlds endangered animals etc...
http://www.swoyersart.com/robert_bateman.htm
My artistic career started with trying to draw a telephone at age 3. My brother inspired me as he was able to draw all the cartoon characters without breaking a sweat.
After my graduation from Fine Arts and the Sciences I was hired to illustrate for the medical, chemistry, physics and engineering departments of the U of BC. Then I was absconded by the Regional Health Authority to illustrate the research papers and patient information for 4 cancer clinics, administration and Health Ministry of the province.
At one time I had 120 medical departments coming to me for everything that made their grants look good to clarifying patient procedure. One of my series is a collection of drawings depicting how to make love with a colostomy bag in the way. My ground breaking stuff was the work I did with researchers and a private Stem Cell Tech. company, later on.
I proved to myself that art was a very practical tool in the world of science. I modeled my goals on Frank Netter http://www.netterimages.com/ who pioneered much of modern medical illustration. Before him only a few artists really paid attention to details like those found in medicine. da Vinci was one of them.
More about me. I'll try to get my more artsy stuff up from my collection but, like your's, they sell and have sold or you end up giving them away. Much of the medical work is now owned by the clients but I have some I can share here as well. Thank you!
lisab said:That's soooo damn cool!
Does doing scientific art all day get in the way of your outside-of-work art?
Andre said:Thanks BW, let me introduce three splendid Dutch wildlife artists, I all know personally, the http://home.hetnet.nl/~alad/index2.html:
http://home.hetnet.nl/~alad/rec-animals/4.jpg
And Remie Bakker, who modelled the saber-toothed cat replica:
![]()
and coauthored the book about that I translated. BTW The prints of the English version are ready now and should be distributed in the next week.
rewebster said:those are good--I like the juxtaposition with the toga guy and the indian (?) elephant---
Andre said:Mammuthus meridionalis, the ancestral (southerly) mammoth that lived about 3.5 Ma- 1 Ma ago, evolving into the Steppe mammoth, Mammuthus trogontherii as well as the several American species, Mammuthus Columbi etc. Although Dick Mol has a point that all were just variations of the same species, Mammuthus meridionalis as the only difference between the forms are the number of enamel plates in the molars.
Anyway, all three artists are specialized in reviving extinct animals in two or three dimensions based on the fossil record and biologic morphology or what's it called.
It's great fun to watch them at work.
=rewebster;1740400]
Most miniatures were about 2 inches to 5 inches in width and were the most popular before photography (before the 1840's). They continued for some time due to their continued admiration even into the 1920's.
rewebster said:baywax---nice genes, there----when people 'think' about DNA or any of those small 'things' people tend to think of artist's rendering without thinking that 'some' artist had to create the imagined view due to the inability to photograph something that small with 'some' sense of what they are looking at (to be able to visualize it)--often those renderings are what most people then tend to think of when they do think of something like 'DNA'. --like the bubbling surface or the spaghetti in that 'Brian Greene's' PBS special.----nice work.
you're not doing those anymore?
I can't see the fireplace yet---so you're doing specialized construction and restoration?
yes--I've had some miniatures, and do still have some ---two that could be 'something', in that, they could (with a lot of could there) be so good, they would make the news if they did turn out to be 'correct/right' (that's art talk for 'not reproductions or fakes'). I've some small icons too that one dealer thought could be 16th to 18th century. But, no, I never got into painting that small. I've known a couple people that did collect them. There was a renewed interest back in the 1920's about miniatures, many books during that time and repro's were made then that tend to confuse beginners (those go for $40-150 depending on the skill level).
rewebster said:I like both the room and the 'ceiling'-----you DO have a fun job plus traveling---my, my---are the figures 'figural' (3-D) or painted?----(isn't it amazing how jobs/careers hinge so much with the previous job/career/commissions? ---bio-med to ceilings) what's next?
I've shown the pair of miniatures to several dealers, etc. and they've told me they should be seen by someone like from the Hague area, or the Rijksmuseum specifically. I think, from what I've seen and segments from the Roadshow, they'd have a 'estimate' but still would recommend 'further research'.
rewebster said:The pigeon is good --I like it----"The Squab of Death"---how many in the edition?
baywax said:And here are the cartoons for a large painting that is in New York. These were part of a series about nuclear holocaust. And strangely peaceful. edit, a fresco actually.
rewebster said:Are they yours?----Where? a ceiling?
here's a link for frescoes for those not too familiar:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresco
rewebster said:Fresco work is definitely a specialized 'niche'---(actually when I asked 'where', I was wondering if it on a 'ceiling' or wall)--from what I've seen, ceilings take a little more work.
I'm guessing you're from the UK? (colour/color)---have you been to the Tate?
rewebster said:yeah, thanks, I did. Each one is totally different to work on, so each one has a different 'technique' so, it's impossible for me to say 'how to do one'. What may not even 'touch' one in the way of cleaning, will take the paint off to the canvas on another---What people do like is my in-painting when there rips, tears, and chunks of paint or canvas missing--some restorers can't match brush strokes, or especially the paint.
on the one above, the photos were taken in two totally different light sources (and a low end camera), so some colors still doesn't match up right.
Cyrus said:I just finished watching a GREAT movie called "POLLOCK" staring Ed Harris. Really good movie.
baywax said:I am Canadian... canuck, lumberjack, eskimo, snowback... cousin to the Americans... the guys that would have liked to help with Independence except we were totally over run by the swarmy dogs.
Yeah, ceilings hurt your neck and you can fall a lot further.
The scariest thing about frescos is that you are applying the pigments while the plaster is wet. It is a grey colour that will eventually dry white. So you do not have a clear idea of what you've just painted. You have to mix on white to get an idea before applying it. Michelangelo had an uncanny talent for this... sometimes going directly on to the wet plaster with his colour. The guy gives me the willies. The cleaned version is nutzo. You'd think it was done by a modernist.
The attached shows how bright it is after 300 years of incense smoke and god knows what else was cleaned off!
lisab said:I don't know much about Jackson Pollock, but I just don't "get" that kind of art. If he was working on a painting and screwed it up, how would he (or anyone) know?
rewebster said:My place looks like that-not frescoes, but paintings (except for the ceiling --its still bare)----not very much of the blank walls still showing.
I picked up a mural 'fragment' by Willy Pogany not too long ago, and it was painted on canvas with remnants of plaster on the back. I'm guessing he glued the canvas to the wall. I tried to read up on him, as there's quite a bit out there on him, but couldn't find out whether he painted first, and then glued the canvas up, or vise-versa. It's still a beautiful piece as a fragment--I bought it for that, the beauty of it--then found out later it was by Pogany.
I've thought about doing something 'sometime' on a couple of my ceilings on canvas glued up there. (that would get around some of the problems with plaster)
lisab said:I don't know much about Jackson Pollock, but I just don't "get" that kind of art. If he was working on a painting and screwed it up, how would he (or anyone) know?
lisab said:I don't know much about Jackson Pollock, but I just don't "get" that kind of art. If he was working on a painting and screwed it up, how would he (or anyone) know?
baywax said:These are pieces that resemble Pollock's work in that they were very new for the time and very controversial. No one could really get them... with the exception of artists and art critics.
When Duchamp did the "Nude Descending A Staircase", even though it was done in a traditional method... paint on canvas, it and he were panned like the plague.
The coolest thing about Jackson's painting is the motion and the residual motions of his action painting.
To tell you the truth, everyday the MOMA or other museums with Pollock's work in them are sweeping up to $20,000 worth of paint off the floor because he used house paint and marine enamels etc... in his work. They are not of archival quality.
rewebster said:I remember reading that one of Picasso's works in some museum had to be turned 'upside-down' for six months out of the year for the paint to get back in place, because, instead of using linseed oil, he used motor oil.
baywax said:Ha ha! That's how them damn "in the moment" people worked. That and there wasn't much in the way of understanding of archival methodologies. None of this seemed to hamper Picasso or any of the other greats from those days. I mean, Beethoven wrote his music while he was deaf and Monet painted his Lilies while going partially blind. Extreme dedication eh?! Sort of like Mick Jaggar still going at it against all odds!
rewebster said:I was looking around on ebay (again), and I saw this painting in the listings view. I thought 'whoa'-- a fantasy/surreal piece of a 'portrait' with an owl's head.
When I when to the item, it was a miniature portrait---the painting itself is only 2 1/2" by 3 1/4"
A beautiful rendering of Napoleon's son, Napoleon Francois Charles Joseph (1811-1832) from his union with Maria Louisa of Austria. This miniature painted on ivory is encased in a Bronze frame decorated with an "N" under a crown supported by Egyptian sphinx. The painting is signed by "Hernandez" and attributed to Daniel Hernandez (1856-1932). In excellent condition; Size 5" height by 3.25" width.
rewebster said:hey, baywax---do you have a website for the company you work for? (you don't have to post it if you don't want to)
baywax said:
rewebster said:my, my, my-------
The company does absolutely incredible and fabulous work---I am really, really impressed. ---really
I started thinking about the quality shown in the photos and thought about William Morris, L. C. Tiffany, and the Roycroft studios and all the various 'products', commissions, etc. they did--only they were more singly minded in their 'style' output (which led to those companies downfall/going out of fashion--but are recognized for their 'style').
my, my, my-----what fun
baywax said:
rewebster said:I was looking around on ebay (again), and I saw this painting in the listings view. I thought 'whoa'-- a fantasy/surreal piece of a 'portrait' with an owl's head.
Nice, especially the sea-scape.rewebster said:I thought I'd post some 'art' that I've collected: