What is the title of the webpage?Do Electrons Really Orbit the Nucleus?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Denver Dang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrons
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Electrons do not orbit the nucleus in the classical sense, as commonly depicted in introductory quantum physics. Instead, they exist as probability distributions within atomic orbitals, representing their statistical presence rather than a defined path. This understanding challenges the traditional view of electrons as particles moving in circular orbits, emphasizing that they are better described as quantum field excitations with nonzero momentum. The misconception arises from outdated quantum theories that oversimplify electron behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with atomic structure and orbitals
  • Knowledge of probability density functions in quantum physics
  • Concept of quantum field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between classical and quantum mechanics in electron behavior
  • Explore the concept of probability density in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about quantum field theory and its implications for particle physics
  • Investigate the historical development of quantum mechanics and its foundational theories
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum physics, educators teaching atomic theory, and anyone interested in the fundamental principles of electron behavior in atoms.

Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1
Hi.

I have a little question. In some of my books you can read that the author keeps saying that an electron is orbiting around the nucleus in it's orbital, and if I'm not mistaken, some equations, or explanations, actually comes from assuming that electrons are orbiting the nucleus in a circular motion.
I'm just beginning quantum physics, so there is probably a lot more advanced stuff that describes those things better, and not assuming that it is orbiting.

But, as far as I can understand, an electron doesn't orbit the nucleus, like a planet does, but instead, statisticially, is everywhere in the orbital, and actually doesn't "move" but just appear out of "nothing".
So isn't the assumptions about electrons orbiting a nucleus wrong, and therefor equations that assume this also wrong, or am I misunderstanding something.


Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're right. So called "old quantum theory" is taught in intro courses and so loads of people who just take those end up believing that that's how QM describes electrons in atoms. Not true.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Electrons in atom orbitals have nonzero momentum. So if you treat them clasically, you can say that they are moving.

However, electrons are not tiny balls, they are quantum field excitations. What is moving is not their center of mass, but their probability density current. You can imagine it as a vessel shaped as a circular loop, filled with water. The water is flowing in a vessel (has nonzero momentum), but it doesn't change position.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K