What is the treatment of a delta function potential in charge integration?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on integrating a charge density involving a delta function potential, specifically the expression ρ = q*δ(𝑟) - (qμ² exp(-μr))/(4πr). The integral for total charge Q = ∫ρ(𝑟)d³𝑟 is evaluated using spherical coordinates, where d³𝑟 = r² dr d(cos θ) dφ. Participants clarify that the integral of the delta function contributes a value of q, while the other term requires careful evaluation. The use of d(cos θ) is recommended for simplifying calculations involving cosine terms in electric potential theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of delta functions in mathematical physics
  • Familiarity with spherical coordinates in triple integrals
  • Knowledge of charge density and electric potential concepts
  • Proficiency in evaluating integrals involving exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of three-dimensional delta functions in integration
  • Learn about spherical coordinate transformations in multivariable calculus
  • Explore electric potential theory and its applications in physics
  • Practice evaluating integrals involving exponential decay functions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism or mathematical physics who are dealing with charge distributions and potential theory.

realcomfy
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am trying to integrate a charge density over a volume in order to obtain a total charge, but there is a delta function involved and I am not entirely sure how to treat it.

\rho = q* \delta (\textbf{r})- \frac {q\mu^{2} Exp(- \mu r)} {4 \pi r}


Q = \int \rho (\textbf{r})d^{3}r

d^{3}r = r^{2} dr d(cos \theta )d \phi


Plugging the density above in the the Q equation should give me the integral over a delta function times the differential volume element minus the integral of the uglier function times the same volume element.

All this is good and fine except that I get that \int q \delta (\textbf{r}) r^{2} drd(cos (\theta)d \phi and I'm not totally sure how to evaluate it. I am pretty sure it should be something like 4 \pi times the function r evaluated at zero, but I can't find the right answer with this approach. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with the properties of the delta function? In particular, this one?

\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}f\left(x\right)\delta\left(x-x'\right)dx = f\left(x'\right)
 
Ya, I got that down. So I was thinking that this integral should be equal to zero because we are evaluating r at 0. But I wasn't sure if that was right or if since we are integrating over a delta function, the whole thing should be equal to q. or 4 \pi q. Ya, I'm a little confused
 
It looks like you'll get two integrals. One that has the delta function in it. That one, when you integrate it, will be zero. But the other one should give you some value.
 
The delta function is a three dimensional delta function

\delta(\textbf{r})=\delta(x)\delta(y)\delta(z)

which obeys

\int d^3r\,\delta(\textbf{r}) = 1.
 
What volume are you exactly integrating over? Why d^{3}r = r^{2} dr d(cos \theta )d \phi.
Were you thinking spherical coordinates?
d^{3}r = r^{2} sin \phi dr d\theta d\phi
That would make things simpler.
 
Winzer said:
What volume are you exactly integrating over? Why d^{3}r = r^{2} dr d(cos \theta )d \phi.
Were you thinking spherical coordinates?
d^{3}r = r^{2} sin \phi dr d\theta d\phi
That would make things simpler.

Actually, using d(\cos\theta) is more simple than \sin\theta d\theta when there are cosine terms in the integrand. They do actually work out to the same thing, but in electric potential theory, due to the prevalence of cosine terms in the integrands, using d(\cos\theta) is the better choice.
 
Thanks, I think I get it now
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K