What is the velocity of sound in air at the temperature of the experiment?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The velocity of sound in air can be calculated using the resonant frequencies of a tube with one end closed. In this discussion, the frequencies of 512 Hz and 280 Hz were used, with a change in tube length of 0.139 m between resonances. The formula applied is v = 4ΔL(1/f2 - 1/f1)^-1, leading to a calculated speed of sound around 344 m/s, which aligns with standard values. The problem's ambiguity regarding harmonic numbers was clarified, emphasizing that the frequencies are not directly related to harmonic order in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and sound propagation
  • Familiarity with resonant frequencies in closed-open tube systems
  • Knowledge of the relationship between frequency, wavelength, and velocity
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations for solving physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of standing waves in closed-open tubes
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the wave equation v = fλ
  • Explore the concept of harmonics and their implications in acoustics
  • Investigate the effects of temperature and pressure on the speed of sound in air
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focused on wave mechanics, acoustics, and sound propagation. This discussion is also beneficial for educators and anyone involved in experimental physics related to sound.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A glass tube has one end dipping into a large container of water and its height above the water is slowly increased until it resonates to a tuning fork of frequency 512Hz. It is then raised further until it resonates to a tuning fork of frequency 280Hz. The distance the tube has been raised in passing from one resonant length to the other is 0.139m. What is the velocity of sound in air at the temperature of the experiment?

Homework Equations


v=wavelength * frequency
wavelength=4L/(2n-1) for open-closed tube, L is length of tube, n is number of segments or number of antinodes.

The Attempt at a Solution



The resonation is done in a tube with one end open and one end closed. So the frequency must be odd integer multiples of each other. However 512/280=64/35 suggesting that 512 is an even number in fact 64 times the fundamental frequency. So is that a mistake in the problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the tube is raised it will resonate at the point when

\lambda = 4L

We therefore find that a standing wave forms when the air column is a quarter wavelength long. The next length that will form a standing wave is three quarters of a wavelength.
The air column length for the second (lower) frequency will be given by a similar formula since its wavelength is longer than that of the higher frequency. Another way to describe the relationship between the various quantitites in this case is therefore given by:

L = \frac{v}{4f}
 
Last edited:
There is nothing special about the frequencies 512 and 280 and the ratio between them. The two frequencies could be anything.

If the length of the resonating tube was x meters for the resonance at 512 Hz, it was x + 0.139 meters for the resonance at 280 Hz. Use the relevant equations you stated twice, to eliminate x.
 
andrevdh said:
When the tube is raised it will resonate at the point when

\lambda = 4L

We therefore find that a standing wave forms when the air column is a quarter wavelength long. The next length that will form a standing wave is three quarters of a wavelength.
The air column length for the second (lower) frequency will be given by a similar formula since its wavelength is longer than that of the higher frequency. Another way to describe the relationship between the various quantitites in this case is therefore given by:

L = \frac{v}{4f}

How do you know it's the first and second harmonics?

I am trying to find the harmonic number by looking at the frequency but one of them gives an even number which shouldn't happen for a closed and open pipe. Or is there something I am missing?
 
AlephZero said:
There is nothing special about the frequencies 512 and 280 and the ratio between them. The two frequencies could be anything.

If the length of the resonating tube was x meters for the resonance at 512 Hz, it was x + 0.139 meters for the resonance at 280 Hz. Use the relevant equations you stated twice, to eliminate x.

But what is n? The question didn't state which harmonic they were resonating at. If I assume they were resonating at 1 and 2 harmonics than I get the speed of sound in air to be 61.4m/s which is not the suggested answer at the back of the book.
 
Since the length of the air column is increased from zero the standing wave will form when it can accommodate a quarter of a wavelength.
 
andrevdh said:
Since the length of the air column is increased from zero the standing wave will form when it can accommodate a quarter of a wavelength.

This wasn't explicitly stated in the problem.

But if we assume this than if you follow the calculations you should get the speed of air to be around 62m/s. Do you also get this? But the answers at the back of the book suggested 344m/s
 
Well I assure you that is what they intended to convey (which they did a bad job of if that was the original wording):

f_1 = 512 Hz

f_2 = 280 Hz

\Delta L = 0.139 m


v = 4\ \Delta L \left(\frac{1}{f_2} - \frac{1}{f_1}\right)^{-1}
 
Last edited:
I see, they change the length of the tube so the frequency doesn't change, i.e it is always the first fundalmental harmonic. Hence the two frequencies are not related to each other. They should have stated this in the problem. When I did it, I intepreted that in the first case it was the 1st harmonic frequency and the second it was the 2nd harmonic even though the length of the tubes were different.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The wavelength of the second tuning fork is longer than that of the first. That way resonance will also occur when a quarter of its wavelength fits into the air column as it is lengthened beyond the first resonance.
 
  • #11
How did you get this from the (ambigous) way the problem was stated?
 
  • #12
The first resonance is for a tuning fork of frequency 512Hz. The second resonance is for a tuning fork of frequency 280Hz, which generates a sound wave with a longer frequency than the first sound wave.

Remember that the wavelength of a particular tuning fork is fixed. So if the air column is slowly lengthened a quarter of a wavelength will fit for the first (and second) resonance lengths.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K