What is the velocity of sound in air at the temperature of the experiment?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a glass tube that resonates at two different frequencies, 512 Hz and 280 Hz, as its length is adjusted. Participants are tasked with determining the velocity of sound in air based on the resonant lengths and the change in tube height.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants discuss the relationship between the frequencies and the resonant lengths, questioning whether the frequencies correspond to the first and second harmonics. Others explore the implications of the tube's length and the standing wave formation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering various interpretations of the problem setup. Some suggest using equations to relate the lengths and frequencies, while others express confusion about the harmonic numbers and the expected speed of sound. There is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the harmonics or the correct approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not clearly state which harmonics are involved, leading to differing assumptions about the resonances. Additionally, there is mention of discrepancies between calculated speeds of sound and those suggested in reference materials.

pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A glass tube has one end dipping into a large container of water and its height above the water is slowly increased until it resonates to a tuning fork of frequency 512Hz. It is then raised further until it resonates to a tuning fork of frequency 280Hz. The distance the tube has been raised in passing from one resonant length to the other is 0.139m. What is the velocity of sound in air at the temperature of the experiment?

Homework Equations


v=wavelength * frequency
wavelength=4L/(2n-1) for open-closed tube, L is length of tube, n is number of segments or number of antinodes.

The Attempt at a Solution



The resonation is done in a tube with one end open and one end closed. So the frequency must be odd integer multiples of each other. However 512/280=64/35 suggesting that 512 is an even number in fact 64 times the fundamental frequency. So is that a mistake in the problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the tube is raised it will resonate at the point when

[tex]\lambda = 4L[/tex]

We therefore find that a standing wave forms when the air column is a quarter wavelength long. The next length that will form a standing wave is three quarters of a wavelength.
The air column length for the second (lower) frequency will be given by a similar formula since its wavelength is longer than that of the higher frequency. Another way to describe the relationship between the various quantitites in this case is therefore given by:

[tex]L = \frac{v}{4f}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
There is nothing special about the frequencies 512 and 280 and the ratio between them. The two frequencies could be anything.

If the length of the resonating tube was x meters for the resonance at 512 Hz, it was x + 0.139 meters for the resonance at 280 Hz. Use the relevant equations you stated twice, to eliminate x.
 
andrevdh said:
When the tube is raised it will resonate at the point when

[tex]\lambda = 4L[/tex]

We therefore find that a standing wave forms when the air column is a quarter wavelength long. The next length that will form a standing wave is three quarters of a wavelength.
The air column length for the second (lower) frequency will be given by a similar formula since its wavelength is longer than that of the higher frequency. Another way to describe the relationship between the various quantitites in this case is therefore given by:

[tex]L = \frac{v}{4f}[/tex]

How do you know it's the first and second harmonics?

I am trying to find the harmonic number by looking at the frequency but one of them gives an even number which shouldn't happen for a closed and open pipe. Or is there something I am missing?
 
AlephZero said:
There is nothing special about the frequencies 512 and 280 and the ratio between them. The two frequencies could be anything.

If the length of the resonating tube was x meters for the resonance at 512 Hz, it was x + 0.139 meters for the resonance at 280 Hz. Use the relevant equations you stated twice, to eliminate x.

But what is n? The question didn't state which harmonic they were resonating at. If I assume they were resonating at 1 and 2 harmonics than I get the speed of sound in air to be 61.4m/s which is not the suggested answer at the back of the book.
 
Since the length of the air column is increased from zero the standing wave will form when it can accommodate a quarter of a wavelength.
 
andrevdh said:
Since the length of the air column is increased from zero the standing wave will form when it can accommodate a quarter of a wavelength.

This wasn't explicitly stated in the problem.

But if we assume this than if you follow the calculations you should get the speed of air to be around 62m/s. Do you also get this? But the answers at the back of the book suggested 344m/s
 
Well I assure you that is what they intended to convey (which they did a bad job of if that was the original wording):

[tex]f_1 = 512 Hz[/tex]

[tex]f_2 = 280 Hz[/tex]

[tex]\Delta L = 0.139 m[/tex]


[tex]v = 4\ \Delta L \left(\frac{1}{f_2} - \frac{1}{f_1}\right)^{-1}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
I see, they change the length of the tube so the frequency doesn't change, i.e it is always the first fundalmental harmonic. Hence the two frequencies are not related to each other. They should have stated this in the problem. When I did it, I intepreted that in the first case it was the 1st harmonic frequency and the second it was the 2nd harmonic even though the length of the tubes were different.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The wavelength of the second tuning fork is longer than that of the first. That way resonance will also occur when a quarter of its wavelength fits into the air column as it is lengthened beyond the first resonance.
 
  • #11
How did you get this from the (ambigous) way the problem was stated?
 
  • #12
The first resonance is for a tuning fork of frequency 512Hz. The second resonance is for a tuning fork of frequency 280Hz, which generates a sound wave with a longer frequency than the first sound wave.

Remember that the wavelength of a particular tuning fork is fixed. So if the air column is slowly lengthened a quarter of a wavelength will fit for the first (and second) resonance lengths.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K