What is the Waveform of Virtual Photons?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of virtual photons, particularly their waveforms and how they relate to the behavior of real photons. Participants explore concepts of photon detection, the properties of virtual photons, and the implications of these properties in the context of electromagnetic interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that while individual photons cannot have their wavelength or frequency reliably measured, they collectively form a pattern that indicates they share specific properties.
  • Another participant argues that virtual photons do not exist in a physical sense and lack electric or magnetic fields, thus do not have a waveform or wavefunction.
  • A participant points out that the highest peaks of individual photons are not necessarily aligned with expected positions, implying complexities in photon behavior.
  • There is a challenge to the idea that virtual photons are emitted by charges to convey forces, suggesting that this is a misunderstanding of how virtual particles function.
  • References to external resources are provided for further reading on the topic of photons and virtual particles, indicating that the discussion may be based on misconceptions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and properties of virtual photons, with some asserting they do not have physical characteristics like waveforms, while others propose specific characteristics based on charge interactions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Some claims made in the discussion rely on interpretations of quantum mechanics and may depend on specific definitions of virtual particles. There are indications of misunderstandings regarding the nature of virtual photons and their role in force mediation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring quantum mechanics, particularly in understanding the distinctions between real and virtual photons, as well as the implications of these concepts in electromagnetic theory.

Jeff Root
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
My understanding is that the wavelength or frequency of an
individual photon cannot be reliably measured. For example,
if a beam of monochromatic light is filtered so that only one
photon at a time enters a spectroscope, each photon may land
anywhere on the screen. Only when a statistically large number
of photons have hit the screen does it become apparent that
they form a bright line in a specific position, with individual
hits having something similar to a Gaussian distribution.

The fact that the pattern emerges from observing the hits of
numerous individual photons shows that each individual photon
does have the same specific wavelength and frequency.

Also, detection of a photon is all or nothing. A photon is
either detected or not. The entire photon must reach any
detector in order for it to be detected, and then all you can
know is where and when the photon hit, and roughly how much
energy it had relative to the detector, again with something
like a Gaussian distribution. That means the waveform of an
individual photon cannot be observed at all.

The electric force is carried by virtual photons.

Positive charges continuously "emit" virtual photons which
repel other positive charges and attract negative charges.

Negative charges continuously "emit" virtual photons which
repel other negative charges and attract positive charges.

There must be a difference between these two types of virtual
photons. Could it be a difference in their waveforms?

For example, might virtual photons emitted by positive
charges have an electric field which first goes positive,
then negative, while virtual photons emitted by negative
charges have an electric field which first goes negative,
then positive?

Such as the two configurations on the left in this diagram:

http://www.freemars.org/jeff/misc/cosmolog/4photons.png

-- Jeff, in Minneapolis
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, virtual photons do not exist except in the math. They have no electric (or magnetic) field and don't behave like real photons (which have alternating electric and magnetic fields associated with them). They have no 'waveform' or wavefunction. They don't even move through space.
 
Before you continue consider this.

The highest peak of those individual photons are not in front of those slits.
 
Jeff Root said:
Positive charges continuously "emit" virtual photons which
repel other positive charges and attract negative charges.

Negative charges continuously "emit" virtual photons which
repel other negative charges and attract positive charges.
This is not how virtual particles convey forces.
As an explanation suitable for an I-level thread, you might try http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Quantum/virtual_particles.html. (However, do note that Baez uses phrases like "monstrous oversimplification" with some frequency in that piece - a proper explanation requires a proper textbook on quantum electrodynamics, but that's not going to work in an I-level thread).

The documents linked from the first two posts of https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-a-photon.879128/ are also good references for photons in general, as is Feynman's math-free and layman friendly book "QED: The strange theory of light and matter".

As this thread is based on several misunderstandings (and is close to violating the Physics Forums rule about personal theories) it is closed. As with all such closures, PM me or any other mentor if you would like to add something to it that will help the next person reading it better understand the physics here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K