What is the weight of the sled?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the weight of a sled after a dog jumps on it, using momentum and kinetic energy principles. The initial momentum equation suggests that the sled's weight equals the dog's weight, but kinetic energy considerations yield a different result, indicating a misunderstanding of energy conservation in inelastic collisions. It is clarified that in a perfectly inelastic collision, momentum is conserved while kinetic energy is not, as energy is lost to heat and sound. The consensus is that only momentum conservation is necessary to solve the problem, as the two bodies move together post-collision. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the sled's weight after the collision.
bennyq
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Simple question, if a dog jumps on a stationary sled at velocity v.. the dog weighs 20kg.
The velocity after is v/2. What is the weight of the sled

Homework Equations


m1v = (m1 + m2)v/2


The Attempt at a Solution


I rearrange this equation and i get m2 = m1.. this is fine.. But what if i use kinetic energy equations, so 1/2mv^2 before should = 1/2mv^2? In this case i get a different answer , i get m2 = 3m1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the definition of inelastic collision?
 
momentum of an isolated system is conserved, so total momentum before equals total momentum after.. for perfect inelastic collision. hence my first equation. Though i also thought no kinetic energy is lost, so kinetic energy before should equal kinetic energy after the collision?
 
In a perfectly inelastic and in an inelastic collision, the total kinetic energy is NOT conserved. Energy is dissipated in the form of heat, sound. So, the total kinetic energy before collision is NOT EQUAL to the total kinetic energy after collision.
 
bennyq said:
momentum of an isolated system is conserved, so total momentum before equals total momentum after.. for perfect inelastic collision.
If you intended this as an answer to the question "what is a "perfectly inelastic collision", you are wrong. Total momentum is conserved in any situation where there is no external force.

hence my first equation. Though i also thought no kinetic energy is lost, so kinetic energy before should equal kinetic energy after the collision?
No, kinetic energy is conserved in a perfectly elastic collision, not in a perfectly inelastic collision. In a perfectly inelastic collision, the two bodies, after the collision, move together with the same velocity.
 
As the others have said, in an inelatic collision, there is a maximal loss of kinetic energy (it is 0 in the centre of momentum frame). This corresponds to the two masses moving together in any other (inertial) frame. So there is only one velocity to consider in the final state, reducing the number of variables in the problem. Then momentum conservation should be sufficient to find the answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top