What is the Young's modulus for concrete under third point loading?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the Young's modulus for concrete using a beam subjected to third point loading. Participants explore the implications of using rupture load deflection versus elastic behavior in concrete, as well as the appropriate methods for calculating Young's modulus.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports a calculated Young's modulus of 6.87 GPa, questioning its validity for concrete.
  • Another participant argues that using rupture load deflection will yield a rupture modulus rather than Young's modulus, emphasizing that concrete does not behave elastically at high stress levels.
  • It is suggested that to obtain Young's modulus, smaller load values should be used in varying increments, applying the deflection formula for a simply supported beam under mid-point load.
  • A participant mentions that using a smaller load of 0.33 kN results in a Young's modulus estimate of around 9 GPa, which they still consider low.
  • Another participant indicates that their calculations yield a range of Young's modulus values from 9 to 30 GPa, ultimately deciding to take the higher value of 30 GPa.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate method for calculating Young's modulus and the implications of using rupture load deflection. There is no consensus on a definitive value for Young's modulus, as estimates vary significantly among participants.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the non-linear stress-strain relationship of concrete at higher loads, which complicates the determination of Young's modulus. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the appropriate load levels and methods for accurate calculations.

ar202
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
I've got a beam of Length 500mm under third point loading.

width = 100mm depth=100mm

Force at rupture is 6.627kN

change in length =0.000019m = 0.019mm

can someone help me with the Youngs modulus please

i'm getting 6.87 GPa... which seems a bit low for concrete? Although possible as i cast it myself!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I am not sure how you are arriving at this figure, but regardless, if you are looking at rupture load deflection, you are not going to get Youngs modulus, you will get a rupture modulus.
Concrete does not behave elastically except for reasonably low levels of stress and strain. When you approach rupture load, the stress strain relation is far from linear, and curves and flattens out considerably.

If you want Youngs modulus, you need to use smaller values of load in varying increments, and calculate it by using the deflection formula for a simply supported beam under mid point load. At higher values of load, you get a secant modulus, which is different.
 
PhanthomJay said:
I am not sure how you are arriving at this figure, but regardless, if you are looking at rupture load deflection, you are not going to get Youngs modulus, you will get a rupture modulus.
Concrete does not behave elastically except for reasonably low levels of stress and strain. When you approach rupture load, the stress strain relation is far from linear, and curves and flattens out considerably.

If you want Youngs modulus, you need to use smaller values of load in varying increments, and calculate it by using the deflection formula for a simply supported beam under mid point load. At higher values of load, you get a secant modulus, which is different.

The smalles load value i have is 0.33kN and a deflection of 0.011mm which still gives me a pretty low value of E... 9GPa i think.
 
PhanthomJay said:
I am not sure how you are arriving at this figure, but regardless, if you are looking at rupture load deflection, you are not going to get Youngs modulus, you will get a rupture modulus.
Concrete does not behave elastically except for reasonably low levels of stress and strain. When you approach rupture load, the stress strain relation is far from linear, and curves and flattens out considerably.

If you want Youngs modulus, you need to use smaller values of load in varying increments, and calculate it by using the deflection formula for a simply supported beam under mid point load. At higher values of load, you get a secant modulus, which is different.

ps thank you for your reply, I've run it through various values and its jumping from 9 to 30GPa. so i think ill take the 30 and run!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
54K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
29K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K