Medical What is Thinking? Theories & Content Explored

  • Thread starter Thread starter rasp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thinking
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanistic and physical theories of thinking, contrasting them with spiritual and pseudoscientific interpretations. Participants explore the brain's data collection and processing mechanisms, referencing techniques in imaging and auditory object recognition. Key studies include Micheyl et al. (2005) on sound sequence perception and Wang (2008) on decision-making in neuronal circuits. The conversation also touches on the concept of 'will' versus 'drives', emphasizing curiosity as a primary motivator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cognitive neuroscience principles
  • Familiarity with auditory object recognition theories
  • Knowledge of decision-making processes in neural circuits
  • Basic grasp of logical programming concepts, such as Prolog
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest imaging techniques in cognitive neuroscience
  • Explore the paper by Micheyl C. et al. on auditory perception
  • Study Wang X-J's work on decision-making in recurrent neuronal circuits
  • Learn about logical programming and its applications in understanding brain functions
USEFUL FOR

Cognitive scientists, neuroscientists, philosophers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of thought and decision-making processes in the brain.

rasp
Messages
117
Reaction score
3
Does anyone know a mechanistic, physical theory of the process of thinking? It seems to involve observation - emotion and so much more, that I have no handle on it.

The only theories I have heard are not physical but involve some spiritual or quantum tunneling out of spacetime and into a nether world of Hilbert possibility. These are usually (and probably rightfully) decried as pseudoscience.

Also, besides the process of thinking, which I'm "thinking" of as analogious to the envelope, what can be said about the thought itself, i.e. the content of the letter?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Sorry! said:
I'm sure this should probably go into the philosophy forums.
Anyways here's an old thread about:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=114825

pretty good information in there.

Yes, good info from a philosophical standpoint, but I was asking more from a physical standpoint. Wondering if new techniques in imaging etc. have revealed the mechanics of thought?
 
The brain is collecting a lot of data such from reading, observing, interacting, listening etc, and then is shuffling these data sets to form new ones. Then it checks it against reality and stores whatever works, and discards whatever doesn't work or is useless. Then it tries to combine the new data sets again with whatever worked before to form even newer data sets. Then repeat.
 
what said:
The brain is collecting a lot of data such from reading, observing, interacting, listening etc, and then is shuffling these data sets to form new ones. Then it checks it against reality and stores whatever works, and discards whatever doesn't work or is useless. Then it tries to combine the new data sets again with whatever worked before to form even newer data sets. Then repeat.

Yeah,that would be a good answer, IF the brain had executive power. What you ascribe to the brain is more like the will, but nobody knows what that is.
 
A theory of elementary "stream segregation", a form of auditory object recognition:

Micheyl C., Tian B., Carlyon R.P., Rauschecker J.P. (2005) Perceptual organization of sound sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. Neuron 6, 139-148
Paper at http://www.tc.umn.edu/~cmicheyl/publis.html
Cool demos at http://www.tc.umn.edu/~cmicheyl/demos.html A review of theories of "decision making":

Wang X-J (2008)
Decision making in recurrent neuronal circuits
Neuron 60: 215-234
http://wanglab.med.yale.edu/webpages/publications.shtml
 
Last edited by a moderator:
look up 'logical programming' or 'prolog'. that should give you some idea of what the brain is doing.

as for the question of 'will', it would be better to think in terms of 'drives'. the first drive is curiosity. it would be nice if we had a 'work' drive. then we could get up in the moring and say 'yay, I get to go to work today' but we dont. work seems to be an afterthought. something that we just do so we can then afford to do the things we really enjoy.
 
granpa said:
look up 'logical programming' or 'prolog'. that should give you some idea of what the brain is doing.

as for the question of 'will', it would be better to think in terms of 'drives'. the first drive is curiosity. it would be nice if we had a 'work' drive. then we could get up in the moring and say 'yay, I get to go to work today' but we dont. work seems to be an afterthought. something that we just do so we can then afford to do the things we really enjoy.

Thanks everyone for your responses. I am still reviewing them, but I'm confident that I will know more soon than when I first asked the questions.

BTW granpa, I think we work for recognition.. a stroke of the old ego, yeah and also to keep the rats from our food..and the rain and cold from soaking our cardboard beds.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K