What Is Wrong with My Washer Method Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter talk2glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
talk2glenn

Homework Statement



The region bounded by x = 1 - y4, is rotated about the line y = -4.
The volume of the resulting solid is:

Homework Equations



Area of a circle: [itex]\pi[/itex]r2
Washer method solution: [itex]\int_a^{b} pi*[f(x)^2-g(x)^2][/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I divided the covered region into two circles: outer with R = 4 + y and inner with r = 4. Then solved using washer method, on the integral from 0 to 1 with respect to x.

[itex]\pi\int_0^{1} [4+(1-x)^{1/4}]^2-4^2dx = 106\pi/15[/itex]

Told this is wrong by the computer. Very frustrating, as I can see no other way to set up this integral, having drawn the diagrams. Any idea what I'm doing wrong? Thanks in advance :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the R = y + 4, but what's the R = 4?

What I get for the solid is an upside-down cake turned on its side and with the bottom extended forever so I get an infinite volume that is curve-cone shaped with an indentation in the "top" (the part starting at the level of x=1 and closing up at x=-255). Haven't done math in so long that I have no idea what the washer method is so can't help you with that.
 
You seem to have the shape correct, but the function is undefined at y = 0 (a global min), so practically speaking the x-axis is an unspoken lower bound. This is why I subtract an inner circle of radius 4.

Otherwise, absent this lower bound, you do indeed have an infinite volume beneath the curve. There is also a given bound at x=0 that I didn't mention in the setup.

Does that clear it up?
 
I don't understand your statement that there is a lower bound on the function but no matter because even with that lower bound the volume is still infinite and I don't see why you say it is not? You have an infinite volumn with a cylinder cut out of the middle, so it is still an infinite volume. Am I missing something?