Negative volume using washer method

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the volume of a solid formed by the area trapped between the curves y = -x² and y = -2x when rotated around the x-axis. Participants are exploring the implications of the washer method in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the intersection points of the curves and question which function serves as the upper or lower bound for the volume calculation. There is a focus on understanding the implications of negative values in the context of volume and the necessity of squaring the functions involved.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights into the confusion regarding which function is on top and how to properly set up the integral. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the curves and the effects of squaring their values on the resulting volume calculation. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and attempts to clarify the setup without reaching a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of negative values in the context of volume and the need to visualize the solid formed by rotation. There is mention of the potential for confusion when determining which function is upper or lower based on their behavior in the specified interval.

terryds
Messages
392
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


What is the volume of a solid formed by the area trapped between y= -x^2 and y= -2x rotated 360° around x-axis?

Homework Equations


V = ∫A(x)dx

The Attempt at a Solution


y=y
-x^2 = -2x
x^2 -2x = 0
x(x-2) = 0

This means that the two functions cross at x = 0 and x = 2
From x = 0 to x = 2 , y = -x^2 will be the upper bound

So, the volume is
## V = \pi \int_{0}^{2}((-x^2)^2-(-2x)^2))dx = \pi \int_{0}^{2}(x^4 - 4x^2)dx = \pi \left [ \frac{1}{5}x^5-\frac{4}{3}x^3 \right ]^2_0 = \pi (\frac{32}{5}-\frac{32}{3})=-4\frac{4}{15}\pi ##

Why do I get negative sign?? What's wrong??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because x(x-2) is negative in your specified interval. x^2 is the lower curve!
 
Orodruin said:
Because x(x-2) is negative in your specified interval. x^2 is the lower curve!
So, to determine which one is upper, we need to see which one is at the top at y positive area (by visualizing rotating it) ?
In other words,
if y < 0 then the upper bound is actually the bottom curve and the lower bound is the top one ??
if y > 0, we just see which one at the top/bottom to decide which one is upper/lower bound..

Is it right?
 
terryds said:
So, to determine which one is upper, we need to see which one is at the top at y positive area (by visualizing rotating it) ?
In other words,
if y < 0 then the upper bound is actually the bottom curve and the lower bound is the top one ??
if y > 0, we just see which one at the top/bottom to decide which one is upper/lower bound..

Is it right?
I don't think -x^2 is the bottom function, but make sure you understand what solid is being formed when you rotate R around the x-axis. Look at one arbitrary x-value and see what happens when you rotate it around the x-axis, and first see what kind of solid you get.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: terryds
terryds said:
So, to determine which one is upper, we need to see which one is at the top at y positive area (by visualizing rotating it) ?
In other words,
if y < 0 then the upper bound is actually the bottom curve and the lower bound is the top one ??
if y > 0, we just see which one at the top/bottom to decide which one is upper/lower bound..

Is it right?
This is more complicated than it needs to be. Because you're squaring the y-values, the squared y-value on the line is larger than the squared y-value on the parabola, so your integral should be ##\int_0^2 (-2x)^2 - (-x^2)^2 dx## to produce a reasonable (i.e., nonnegative) volume.

The region being revolved is equal in area to the region defined by the curves ##y = x^2## and y = 2x, and would make for a simpler integral.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: terryds and Thewindyfan
Mark44 said:
This is more complicated than it needs to be. Because you're squaring the y-values, the squared y-value on the line is larger than the squared y-value on the parabola, so your integral should be ##\int_0^2 (-2x)^2 - (-x^2)^2 dx## to produce a reasonable (i.e., nonnegative) volume.

The region being revolved is equal in area to the region defined by the curves ##y = x^2## and y = 2x, and would make for a simpler integral.
I looked at this incorrectly earlier but I think the OP's mistake was that you had y =-2x be the bottom function instead of the top function.
The easiest way to tell which function is on top of which for problems like these, since that's probably the only challenging part of these problems for most people when it comes to graphing and seeing how the area looks like, is to plug in values between the two points that the curves intersect. Be especially wary about how the area between two curves looks when you have some function like sin or cosine, because you can end up with two integrals if the two curves switch in their orientation to each other (i.e. from 0 to π/4, cos(x) is above sin(x) but from π/4 to π/2, sin(x) is above cos(x)).
 
Thewindyfan said:
I looked at this incorrectly earlier but I think the OP's mistake was that you had y =-2x be the bottom function instead of the top function.
y = -2x is the "bottom" function relative to ##y = -x^2##. However, once you square both of these, then ##(-x^2)^2 \le (-2x)^2## on the interval in question.
Thewindyfan said:
The easiest way to tell which function is on top of which for problems like these, since that's probably the only challenging part of these problems for most people when it comes to graphing and seeing how the area looks like, is to plug in values between the two points that the curves intersect. Be especially wary about how the area between two curves looks when you have some function like sin or cosine, because you can end up with two integrals if the two curves switch in their orientation to each other (i.e. from 0 to π/4, cos(x) is above sin(x) but from π/4 to π/2, sin(x) is above cos(x)).
The simplest thing to do, IMO, for problems such as the one in this thread, is to work with the functions reflected across the x-axis. The area of the region being revolved is the same, and you don't have the complication of figuring out which function is on the bottom.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: terryds
Mark44 said:
The simplest thing to do, IMO, for problems such as the one in this thread, is to work with the functions reflected across the x-axis. The area of the region being revolved is the same, and you don't have the complication of figuring out which function is on the bottom.

I agree with this, I did so without even mentioning it, which is why x^2 is my bottom function. The easier way of looking at this is to consider the volume as the difference between two rotational volumes. It then becomes very clear which is which.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: terryds

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K