edward
- 62
- 167
Fannie and Freddie did it. No, not at all.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html
And the standards were lowered by the ratings industry in order to keep their market share.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...B5EE7C1829D2}&print=true&dist=printMidSection
Private sector loans, not Fannie or Freddie, triggered crisis
Federal housing data reveal that the charges aren't true, and that the private sector, not the government or government-backed companies, was behind the soaring subprime lending at the core of the crisis.
Subprime lending offered high-cost loans to the weakest borrowers during the housing boom that lasted from 2001 to 2007. Subprime lending was at its height from 2004 to 2006.
Federal Reserve Board data show that:
More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions.
Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.
Only one of the top 25 subprime lenders in 2006 was directly subject to the housing law that's being lambasted by conservative critics.
The "turmoil in financial markets clearly was triggered by a dramatic weakening of underwriting standards for U.S. subprime mortgages, beginning in late 2004 and extending into 2007," the President's Working Group on Financial Markets reported Friday.
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/251/story/53802.html
And the standards were lowered by the ratings industry in order to keep their market share.
Credit rating agencies put the global financial system at risk because they had to be lapdogs, not watchdogs, to survive, a top CEO testified Wednesday.
The three major agencies -- Moody's, Standard & Poor's and Fitch -- were caught in a race to bottom, forced to lower their standards in an attempt to maintain their market share, said Raymond McDaniel, chief executive officer of Moody's, who testified on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.
"We drank the 'Kool-Aid, McDaniel wrote in an internal memo released Wednesday.
That race to the bottom was very lucrative in the short-run for the companies, but disastrous for the global economy in the long haul, said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. Waxman said revenues at the three ratings agencies doubled between 2002 and 2007 to $6 billion, while Moody's had the highest profit margin of any company in the S&P 500 for five years running.
The three agencies rate financial securities on the risk that they won't be paid off.
Between 2002 and 2007, the agencies rated a flood of mortgage-related securities issued by Wall Street firms, giving many of the securities a coveted AAA rating at the time, only to downgrade most of them as house prices tanked and defaults spiked. The subsequent collapse in the value of those securities has taken the global financial system to the "brink of the abyss," in the words of the head of the IMF.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...B5EE7C1829D2}&print=true&dist=printMidSection
Last edited by a moderator: