What is your personal policy with preprints?

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter andresB
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the policies surrounding the publication of preprints in academic research, particularly in the fields of physics and materials science. Participants express varying practices, with some opting to wait until their manuscript is accepted by a journal before posting on arXiv, while others advocate for immediate preprint submission regardless of journal acceptance. The consensus indicates that in High Energy Physics (HEP), preprints are a standard expectation, while concerns about double-blind peer review processes are noted as less relevant in physics due to the nature of the field. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding journal policies regarding preprints and the implications for visibility and feedback.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of preprint servers such as arXiv
  • Familiarity with journal submission processes in academic publishing
  • Knowledge of peer review types, including single-blind and double-blind
  • Awareness of the norms in High Energy Physics (HEP) regarding preprints
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the preprint submission policies of specific journals in your field
  • Learn about the implications of preprints on academic visibility and feedback
  • Explore the differences between single-blind and double-blind peer review processes
  • Investigate the role of preprints in High Energy Physics and other scientific disciplines
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and academics involved in publishing their work, particularly those in fields where preprints are common, such as High Energy Physics and materials science.

andresB
Messages
625
Reaction score
374
Assuming you publish preprints at all, then the question is: do you publish you preprints before submitting the paper to a journal? or do you wait to your paper to be accepted before submitting the preprint?

Also, have preprints resulted in more promotion for your work? have you received more feedback?

I usually wait until the manuscript have been accepted for publication in a journal. But for my last work I decided to put it in arxiv first since I have no idea what journal would be suitable for it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
andresB said:
or do you wait to your paper to be accepted before submitting the preprint?
Why would anyone do that?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Why would anyone do that?
If you want a double-blind process for the peer review, for example.
 
Who does double-blind in physics? Experimentally, description of the apparatus gives the secret away (and not just in high energy). Theoretically it's not much better. Heck, it's hard enough to make it single-blind. It's not at all unusual to know who the referees are by what they say and how they say it.
 
I guess that's the huge difference between fields in physics. Working in nano and photonics, I publish in a lot of materials journals as well as physics, so single-blind can be expected. No one can keep track of several thousand researchers all doing related stuff.

No journal I've ever submitted to has been double blind. My name appears at the top. Is that a medicine thing?

But regarding the actual preprint question, it's a case by case basis. I've never felt the need because I've never felt that pressure that my paper needs to be on the record TODAY and not 8 months from now, and we often foot the bill for open access. But I've come to understand that in HEP, preprints are expected for any paper worth anything.
 
crashcat said:
No one can keep track of several thousand researchers all doing related stuff.
You could say that about HEP. But it's often easy to tell.
 
crashcat said:
No journal I've ever submitted to has been double blind. My name appears at the top. Is that a medicine thing?
I just saw the option in IOP for a recent submission in journal of physics A.
 
I think a time or two I waited in cases where a journal's pre-print policy was unclear or when I did not want a version out there that did not incorporate the referee's comments. But if the journal allows posting to arXiv before publication and the co-authors were OK with a version on arXiv without changes based on referee comments, I go ahead and post it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
444
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
777
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K