Can i cite a preprint in a neuroscience paper ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rogerharris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neuroscience Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Preprints are increasingly accepted in neuroscience, with journals like Nature incorporating preprint repository sections. Esteemed scientists utilize preprints for quick dissemination of concepts, often bypassing traditional journal publication for less critical projects. The culture surrounding preprints varies significantly across scientific fields; for instance, astrophysics embraces preprints, while economics remains more conservative. Understanding these differences is crucial for researchers navigating citation practices in their submissions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with preprint repositories and their role in scientific publishing.
  • Understanding of the differences between preprints, draft papers, and working papers.
  • Knowledge of citation practices in various scientific disciplines.
  • Awareness of the publishing landscape, including the influence of for-profit publishers versus non-profit journals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the policies of major neuroscience journals regarding preprint citations.
  • Explore the differences in citation norms between astrophysics and other scientific fields.
  • Investigate the impact of preprints on the peer review process in neuroscience.
  • Learn about the role of professional societies in the publication practices of non-profit journals.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in neuroscience, academic authors, and anyone interested in the evolving landscape of scientific publishing and citation practices.

rogerharris
Messages
125
Reaction score
0
Its becoming more common for journals to have preprint repository sections...i.e. even nature are doing it for neuroscience, and i noticed some respectable scientists are just using this channel to publish stuff at preprint then get colleagues to review, and then not bothering to publish if that paper is only a side issue project for them to make a point. i.e. They are only bothering to go through all the hassle of trying to get journal published when they really have to and using preprints as quick way to develop concepts and pass them round. And this is people near the top of the hierarchy. (no don't ask me for names please)

As an example i was at a high level neuroscience conference recently..cold spring harbour and some top level guys were just saying the journal system puts them through so much Bull%%% and is slowing them down. Ok i don't want to get into the rights and wrongs of this . That could be a debate in itself and perhaps this is because the journals are a bit overloaded for various reasons.

What this means is there are papers at preprint stage i need to cite myself, and was wondering if this has caused any of you problems ?i.e. has a journal you submitted to refused to publish a reference to a preprint ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One thing that I've learned is that the culture of journals are *very* different between different fields of science. Astrophysics tends to have a "let's publish everything not totally nutty and let the community figure it out". Economics does not. I don't know about neuroscience. However in astrophysics, it's very common to cite something on the Los Alamos Preprint Server, and anything that's cutting edge that doesn't do that is likely to be thought of as inferior.

One bit difference between astrophysics and biology is that the major astrophysics journals are non-profit entities controlled by the professional societies, whereas in most biology journals, the major journals are owned by big for-profit publishers that stand to lose a lot of money if people bypass the journals.

Also there is a difference between a "draft paper" and a "preprint." It's very common in the social sciences to publish draft papers for comment and these are marked "not for citation" and as professional courtesy, people don't cite these papers. Curiously this sort of thing doesn't happen very often in astrophysics. The other thing that is interesting in the social sciences is the difference between a "working paper" and a "journal article."
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
8K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K