What is Zero Action? What is zero action?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sunfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Zero
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "zero action" in the context of the principle of least action, exploring its implications in both constrained and unconstrained motion. Participants examine the significance of zero action, particularly in relation to free fall and the behavior of Lagrangians.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that action is zero for unconstrained motion and never zero for constrained motion, questioning whether free fall qualifies as constrained motion.
  • Another participant references the Feynman lectures to provide a broader context for understanding least action.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the significance of zero action and its relation to the Lagrangian of a free-falling body, noting that it becomes zero at half the initial height.
  • It is proposed that the actual value of action is not significant, only that it is minimized, with the possibility of making the action arbitrarily large or small by adding a constant offset to potential energy.
  • A hypothetical scenario is presented where the action remains constant due to a specific relationship between potential and kinetic energy, prompting a participant to acknowledge that while it is theoretically possible, they have not encountered such a system in practice.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications and significance of zero action, with no consensus reached on its meaning or relevance in various contexts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of constrained versus unconstrained motion and the behavior of Lagrangians, which remain unresolved.

Sunfire
Messages
221
Reaction score
4
What is "zero action"

Hello All,

I have been reading this thread, trying to understand the concept of action. There is one very intriguing (to me) statement in that thread:
"So your action is the difference between your capability of motion and your actual motion.
The principle of least action says that there is no difference without some sort of constraint - in which case the motion will be such that this difference is as small as possible." /by Simon Bridge/

Do I understand this correctly - the action is always zero for unconstrained motion; and never zero (but minimal) for constrained motion. Is this reasoning true?

Is free fall a constrained motion? Because the action is zero only at y = y_initial / 2, y is the vertical position.

Perhaps someone has an idea...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you, UltrafastPED; I read the chapter you suggested. Quite a few good points there. I am still having trouble to understand something, though. What is "zero action"? Does it have any significance?

In the chapter by Feinman, the free falling body moves downwards and its lagrangian changes from negative to positive. At some point (half the initial height), it becomes zero. Does this zero lagrangian have any physical significance?
 
The actual value of the action is not important, only that it is minimized. The value of the action can be made arbitrarily large or small simply by adding a constant offset to the potential.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
DaleSpam said:
The actual value of the action is not important, only that it is minimized. The value of the action can be made arbitrarily large or small simply by adding a constant offset to the potential.

This makes perfect sense.
What if, in a system,
Ep = f(x) - C, C is arbitrary constant
Ek = f(x)
for all x.

Then L = Ek - Ep = C for all x, thus the action remains constant. Does this ever happen?
 
In principle, it is possible, but I have never seen such a system. Usually the potential energy is a function of the generalized positions and the kinetic energy is a function of the generalized velocities, so I haven't seen a case where they are the same functions like that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
  • · Replies 140 ·
5
Replies
140
Views
14K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K