Everyone tells me here, time travel is not even *theortically* possible. Some scientist are bold and say time traevl to the future IS possible. I don't understand why no one here even accepts it as a theortically possbility? Physics allows it, and I don't have a PhD in physics but according to special relativity if it was possible to get close to the speed of light you would travel into the future relative to the people on earth are those speeds. The problem is getting to those speeds, as light travels at 186,000 MPS and the fastest we've gone is about 20,000 MPH Seriously, why doesn't anyone here agree with it? Is Frank Tipler a hoax? I Find it pretty funny how people tell me the Science Channel is wrong on all of its channels. It has alot of facts, right ones at that, sure, it may be to the laymen people, but whatever. Frank Tipler said if you were to rotate a massive object it would bend time and you may be able to travel into the past. There are also hypotentical cosmic strings. Is Frank Tipler, PhD some type of psuedo Jack Thompson wacko? I just don't understand , I just search in time travel, I see valid scientific facts (Not the hoax ones) that it IS possible, yet many people here are very smart people with PhD degreees and scientist and everyone degrees. In fact, I can't find a single person to admit its a theortically possbility at best. (Or that physics allows it) Even stephen hawking in his "Brief history of time' mentions it may be possible. Yet people want me to quote the book, I don't even have it, but I read it.