- 20,798
- 28,363
This is not how growth on a compact manifold works. We call the averaging mechanism migration, and it already has begun.BWV said:But populations are not growing outside of Africa
This is not how growth on a compact manifold works. We call the averaging mechanism migration, and it already has begun.BWV said:But populations are not growing outside of Africa
World population 1918 was 1.8 billion peopleBWV said:But populations are not growing outside of Africa
pinball1970 said:World population 1918 was 1.8 billion people
2023 8 billion
UK population 1918 was 40 million
2023 67 million
Maybe an average, but plenty of animals around today that predate the dinosaurspinball1970 said:Back to the next 1 million years thing, a few searches on Smithsonian state roughly 1 million years for a species before it is in danger of going extinct with an upper limit of 10 million years.
Fertility has declined everywhere except Africa? Is that actual fertility rates or choosing to have less in other countries? Also of those 5 children in Africa, how many die of malnutrition or infection before the age of 5?BWV said:
Yes a few, not mammals on the whole and certainly not "man."BWV said:Maybe an average, but plenty of animals around today that predate the dinosaurs
pinball1970 said:Fertility has declined everywhere except Africa?
pinball1970 said:Is that actual fertility rates or choosing to have less in other countries?
Far fewer than in the past, which is why the population is growingpinball1970 said:Also of those 5 children in Africa, how many die of malnutrition or infection before the age of 5?
There is a difference between actual fertility, the ability to produce viable gametes and deliberately avoiding conception.BWV said:Its declining in Africa too, but still highWhat is the difference?
Far fewer than in the past, which is why the population is growing
View attachment 335341
Not in the data, it just measures the results, but the impact of the global decline in sperm counts is no doubt part of thatpinball1970 said:There is a difference between actual fertility, the ability to produce viable gametes and deliberately avoiding conception.
All the predictions I've seen are for the global population growth to slow and stabilise this century. I don't know whether those predictions are reliable. In any case, it's somewhat more difficult to predict the human population of Earth a million years from now.pinball1970 said:There is a difference between actual fertility, the ability to produce viable gametes and deliberately avoiding conception.
Some cross over though.Vanadium 50 said:Waitasecond....
I have two parents, four grandparents, eight grand-grandparents. Looks to me like the population is decreasing.
![]()
We would turn on the great machine and wipe out the civilization in one night.Uri Zlatnik said:What kind of technology will be available in a million years from now? Is the world going to be a better place in a million years from today?
Will it be possible to solve chess or have completely self-driving cars and self-driving trucks in a million years from now?
nsaspook said:We would turn on the great machine and wipe out the civilization in one night.
nsaspook said:We would turn on the great machine and wipe out the civilization in one night.
We are the most successful animal species on the planet, can survive in more climates than roaches or rats, so if any large animals survive, we will be at the top of the list.pinball1970 said:Yes a few, not mammals on the whole and certainly not "man."
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/03/2/l_032_04.html#:~:text=The typical rate of extinction,mammalian species alive at present.
She was stunning. 26 in the filmPeroK said:And when Altaira got back to Earth, she set up as a private detective, aka Honey West:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058814/
8 billion yes. Very few of those driving the train. (Jim Jeffries I recommend)BWV said:We are the most successful animal species on the planet, can survive in more climates than roaches or rats, so if any large animals survive, we will be at the top of the list.
Oh noes! I never made that connection.pinball1970 said:When he got back to earth he settled down got a less stressful job got old gracefully and even helped civilians with taxidermy now and again.
There is already a sequel:berkeman said:I guess I see an opportunity for an interesting sequel to Forbidden Planet,
Spoilsport...BWV said:Back to the OP

Almost certainly not in medical science, given the timeframe of the OP. It is quite possible that as we continue medical research that we will find cures and prophylactic measures to cure/prevent most diseases and extend human lifetimes significantly. That may open up a whole different issue with overpopulation, if lifetimes are routinely extended to, say, 500 years. Not to mention the possible mind-electronics links that are likely, which could introduce issues with "artificial intelligence" being combined with (well, you know...).BWV said:It may be that we are well along on the flattening of the curve.
... I saw it at the Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch. That's the further east I've ever been - all the way to the end of the District Line!PeroK said:There is already a sequel:
I hope it was better in person than in that trailer...PeroK said:... I saw it at the Queen's Theatre, Hornchurch. That's the further east I've ever been - all the way to the end of the District Line!
I suspect it will be under water by then.docnet said:I'd guess years from now, a larger portion of the population would probably be living in cities. I really want to see what Manhattan looks like in 500 years, probably a lot more different from now.![]()