What kind of work does an astrophysicist do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TheShapeOfTime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Astrophysicist Work
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of work performed by astrophysicists, exploring various aspects of their roles, required skills, and educational pathways. Participants share insights into both theoretical and observational work, as well as the importance of programming and data analysis in the field.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe astrophysicists as physicists who study the universe and its workings, with no official definition of the term.
  • One participant mentions their daily work involves reducing and interpreting observational data, with plans to incorporate simulations and theoretical studies.
  • There are observations about the challenges of studying the cosmos from a single point of view, likening it to viewing a point on a plane.
  • Several participants emphasize the necessity of computer programming skills for astrophysicists, citing its importance in data analysis, simulations, and software development.
  • Discussions include various programming languages deemed useful, such as Fortran, Perl, and MATLAB, with some participants advocating for knowledge in statistics as well.
  • One participant shares an example of a professor running simulations to model galaxy collisions, highlighting practical applications of programming in research.
  • Concerns are raised about the educational requirements for entering the field, with discussions on the necessity of computer science courses and the variability of requirements across institutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the skills and knowledge required for astrophysicists, particularly regarding the importance of programming. While there is some consensus on the need for computer skills, the specifics of educational requirements and the definition of an astrophysicist remain less clear, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of what constitutes an astrophysicist, differing opinions on the necessity of specific programming languages, and the lack of consensus on educational pathways across different institutions.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in pursuing a career in astrophysics, students preparing for college in STEM fields, and those curious about the practical applications of programming in scientific research may find this discussion informative.

  • #31
da615 said:
Graduates who go into Astrophysics choose to specialize in either the observational or the theoretical aspect of the field. Those who choose the former option need some basic core courses in Physics (EM, QM, CM and Math methods) as well as Atomic Physics and a pretty sound knowledge of computer programming e.g. IDL. A lot of observational Astrophysics is applied Atomic Physics. Many people go into it thinking that you'll be looking at cool Astro photographs a lot. Nothing can be further from the truth. You'll spend endless hours reducing spectral data. These kinds of Astrophysicists spend most of their time quibbling about various optimal filtering techniques , etc. to spot whatever they are after.

In case you are more interested in the theoretical aspect, you need to be VERY good at Math. You need a thorough knowledge of Differential Geometry, for example. Many theorists focus on solving complicated fluid dynamical equations with Magnetohydrodynamics/ Plasma Physics also thrown in. If you want to work on General Relativistic applications you obviously have to have a good background in GR. These types of Astrophysicists need more advanced Physics classes than the ones who focus on taking and interpreting observational data.

These are both excellent descriptions of the extremes, but let's keep in mind that they are a bit idealized. I don't fit well into either of those categories and neither do many of my colleagues. There is a lot of room for people in between pure observational work and hardcore theory. This is fortunate, because both of these things would bore me to tears in the forms described above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Not very many people do astronomy anymore. Historically, astronomy was more charting stars and cataloging magnitudes etc. There's not too much of that going on anymore. Most "astronomers" are really astrophysicists. Astrophysics is basically physics that you can't do on Earth :)
 
  • #33


I'm a kid just going into High school next year. I'm looking for a job that studies how the universe works. I'm interested in all kinds of the things like coil guns perpetual motion machines. Would astro physics be a career I would pick?
 
  • #34


Brilliant_kid said:
I'm a kid just going into High school next year. I'm looking for a job that studies how the universe works. I'm interested in all kinds of the things like coil guns perpetual motion machines. Would astro physics be a career I would pick?

...You bumped a 4 year old tread to talk about perpetual motion machines?

No, if you think such a thing can exist, I suggest you stay far away from physics of any sort.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K