archis
- 66
- 1
If a apple falls on my head, what is the physical value that makes my head hurt?
What physical quantity causes pain when an apple falls on your head?
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
17 replies · 4K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Discussion
TheDestroyer
- 401
- 1
If the question is that simple, then the answer is simpler :D
ANSWER IS: IMPULSE
want more details? ask, hehehehe. And please set some good title for the topic next time.
bye
ANSWER IS: IMPULSE
want more details? ask, hehehehe. And please set some good title for the topic next time.
bye
archis
- 66
- 1
OK, ill make it little bit difficult.
Lets say a concrete block holds an element that has a weight of 100 kN. The block cracks, is destroyed if the weight is 200kN. So from what height should the element fall to destroy the concrete block? I want to compere the stress done by the element to the block if it just stands there and if it is in motion.
Lets say a concrete block holds an element that has a weight of 100 kN. The block cracks, is destroyed if the weight is 200kN. So from what height should the element fall to destroy the concrete block? I want to compere the stress done by the element to the block if it just stands there and if it is in motion.
Last edited:
dave_baksh
- 21
- 0
The force of the impact (impulse) on your head is equal to the mass of the apple multiplied by the rate of change of velocity of the apple with respect to time.
xxChrisxx
- 2,056
- 85
Force=MA
Impulse=Int F dt
KE doesn't hurt no matter how much it has. Force is what makes it hurt, which is determined by acceleration.
Impulse=Int F dt
KE doesn't hurt no matter how much it has. Force is what makes it hurt, which is determined by acceleration.
archis
- 66
- 1
''Force is what makes it hurt, which is determined''
So why the apple standing still on my head doesn't hurt, but falling from tree does. Apple produces force F=mg, does it get bigger if it falls? think not. How to compere stress done to my head between these two apple conditions?
So why the apple standing still on my head doesn't hurt, but falling from tree does. Apple produces force F=mg, does it get bigger if it falls? think not. How to compere stress done to my head between these two apple conditions?
dave_baksh
- 21
- 0
Because the apple sitting on your head isn't experiencing a decelleration. The decelleration of an apple falling onto your head (and being slowed down by your head) is what produces the force which you feel.
xxChrisxx
- 2,056
- 85
mg is the applies weight.
The force it makes is F=MA.
Where A is (vmax-vmin/time).
So for example. let's say the apple weighs 1 Kg (its a bloody big apple). And it's traveling at 10m/s and stops in 1 second.
The force it applies to your head at contact is. 1(kg)*10(m/s^2)=10N.
Lets say it stops in 0.1 of a second.
the acceleration is now 100m/s/s so the force is now 100N.EDIT: So there's no confusion when I say acceleration that includes deceleration, but there is little point makign any distinction as they are both the same thing.
The force it makes is F=MA.
Where A is (vmax-vmin/time).
So for example. let's say the apple weighs 1 Kg (its a bloody big apple). And it's traveling at 10m/s and stops in 1 second.
The force it applies to your head at contact is. 1(kg)*10(m/s^2)=10N.
Lets say it stops in 0.1 of a second.
the acceleration is now 100m/s/s so the force is now 100N.EDIT: So there's no confusion when I say acceleration that includes deceleration, but there is little point makign any distinction as they are both the same thing.
Last edited:
archis
- 66
- 1
Thank you xxChrissxx now it makes sence. So to know how big will be the force i need to know how much the impact would take time? And the time of the process is dependent from the elasticity of my head? Am i thinking right? Now it makes sense to put a pillow on my head.
Last edited:
xxChrisxx
- 2,056
- 85
Thats spot on archis.
archis
- 66
- 1
If the A hits B is it possible to calculate accurate this force (see post #3) or only tests and experiments could give a accurate result?
xxChrisxx
- 2,056
- 85
Well strictly it can only be done empirically, as collisions are generally very complex and no two collions are ever precisely thae same. It depends on how the bricks are orientated, how they strike the ground. What the two materials are made of, what happends during the impact event. etc etc.
However with some simple assumptions and some information on the impact, you'll have to make an educated stab at guessing the impact time you can work out the drop height to attain a force necessary to break something.
However with some simple assumptions and some information on the impact, you'll have to make an educated stab at guessing the impact time you can work out the drop height to attain a force necessary to break something.
I_am_no1
- 17
- 0
Suppose you are standing on planet Earth now the apple is falling down on your head freely. Then its force should be F = mg OR GMm/(r - h)2
where, m = mass of apple
M = mass of Earth
r = distance of apple from Earth
h = your height
when this apple will fall on the surface of head it would create pressure.
P = F / A
as much pressure it would create that much pain you would get.
You have already taken revenge of this pain according to NEWTONS LAW by creating same but opposite force. F = - mg
so the apple can be smashed
where, m = mass of apple
M = mass of Earth
r = distance of apple from Earth
h = your height
when this apple will fall on the surface of head it would create pressure.
P = F / A
as much pressure it would create that much pain you would get.
You have already taken revenge of this pain according to NEWTONS LAW by creating same but opposite force. F = - mg
so the apple can be smashed
Last edited:
Gear300
- 1,212
- 10
The force upon collision isn't the same as when it is standing still. When something picks up speed and collides into something, there will be a transfer of energy resulting in a large momentary jump in the force, which can be described by the impulse - the impulse is the change in momentum, or for that matter, the distribution of momentum across the interacting objects - it can also describe the "distribution" of force through time.
TheDestroyer
- 401
- 1
I've left this thread for two days, now I come back to see that my reason is wrong? are you guys saying that it's not "IMPULSE" that's causing the hurt?
Should I remind you people that the definition of impulse is "the change in momentum through time" which means the change in velocity. The apply hurts him because it's decelerating, i.e. it's because the impulse his head is applying on the apple!
Impulse also explains why if a fast car hits a wall the damage is more than a slow car hitting the wall, it's because the impulse the wall applies on the latter is less!
am I saying wrong?!
Should I remind you people that the definition of impulse is "the change in momentum through time" which means the change in velocity. The apply hurts him because it's decelerating, i.e. it's because the impulse his head is applying on the apple!
Impulse also explains why if a fast car hits a wall the damage is more than a slow car hitting the wall, it's because the impulse the wall applies on the latter is less!
am I saying wrong?!
xxChrisxx
- 2,056
- 85
Dont panic impluse is the same thing. Impulse is acutally more correct as it takes into account the distrubution over time.
impulse = f * t
The method we used assumes an average force, but is a more simple explinations as it doesn't require calculus. Its still the force that does the hurting, impulse describes how the force acts better.
Eg. When we say that its force, we acutally mean impulse. But for someone who is unfamiliar with the concepts this caould be confusing. because what we are waying is tha tthe force is acting over the impact time.
Apple 1 KG, stops from 10m/s in 1 S.
Force = 10N
The impluse applied is 10(n) for 1(s) = 10NsUsing the rate of change of mumentum and time, we will still get a 10Ns impulse, but your method will describe the curve of how the force acts. The area unde rthe force-time curve will be the same in both incidences. So for example it would start and end at zero, curve and peak at 20N
impulse = f * t
The method we used assumes an average force, but is a more simple explinations as it doesn't require calculus. Its still the force that does the hurting, impulse describes how the force acts better.
Eg. When we say that its force, we acutally mean impulse. But for someone who is unfamiliar with the concepts this caould be confusing. because what we are waying is tha tthe force is acting over the impact time.
Apple 1 KG, stops from 10m/s in 1 S.
Force = 10N
The impluse applied is 10(n) for 1(s) = 10NsUsing the rate of change of mumentum and time, we will still get a 10Ns impulse, but your method will describe the curve of how the force acts. The area unde rthe force-time curve will be the same in both incidences. So for example it would start and end at zero, curve and peak at 20N
Last edited:
TheDestroyer
- 401
- 1
Actually my answer was for what he's asked! He asked "what's the physical quantity that causes the pain", well, the answer is impulse!
Your last post now solved the problem, because he's ought to understand it's eventually called impulse :)
Ciao
Your last post now solved the problem, because he's ought to understand it's eventually called impulse :)
Ciao
TheDestroyer
- 401
- 1
by the way, I like that expression "panic" of yours :P