What Prevents Quark-Antiquark Annihilation in Neutral Pions and J/ψ Mesons?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Annihilation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanisms that prevent quark-antiquark annihilation in neutral pions and J/ψ mesons during their short lifetimes. Participants explore theoretical concepts related to particle decay, the role of wavefunctions, and the implications of chiral symmetry in quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions what prevents quark-antiquark annihilation in neutral pions and J/ψ mesons, suggesting that annihilation should be immediate.
  • Another participant proposes that the lifetime of these particles can be viewed as a measure of the time it takes for the antiparticle to collide with the particle, relating it to the probability of finding the antiparticle at the same location as the particle.
  • It is noted that the annihilation process is statistical, with some bound states decaying faster than others, and the lifetime represents the average time for a significant portion of a sample to decay.
  • A participant mentions the extremely short decay times for neutral pions and J/ψ mesons, providing specific time scales for their lifetimes.
  • Another participant introduces the concept that light pseudo-scalar mesons, such as pions, are protected by their nature as nearly Goldstone bosons of spontaneously broken chiral symmetry in QCD, linking their stability to weak interactions and axial anomaly mechanisms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the mechanisms preventing annihilation, with some focusing on statistical aspects and others on theoretical frameworks like chiral symmetry. No consensus is reached regarding the primary factors involved.

Contextual Notes

Discussions include assumptions about the nature of particle interactions, the role of wavefunctions, and the implications of chiral symmetry, which may not be fully resolved or universally accepted among participants.

TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
I was wondering, for instance in a neutral pion or the j/ψ meson, what prevents quark-antiquark annihilation during its short lifetime? I mean what allows them to be particles, shouldn't annihilation be inmediate? is it the time it takes quark and antiquark to collide inside the particle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TrickyDicky said:
I was wondering, for instance in a neutral pion or the j/ψ meson, what prevents quark-antiquark annihilation during its short lifetime? I mean what allows them to be particles, shouldn't annihilation be inmediate? is it the time it takes quark and antiquark to collide inside the particle?

Yes, you can think of the lifetime as a measure of the average amount of time that it takes for the antiparticle to collide with the particle. It turns out that this is inversely proportional to the probability of finding the antiparticle at the same location of the particle, ##|\psi(0)|^2##. Here ##\psi(x)## is the wavefunction of the antiparticle in coordinates where the particle is located at ##x=0##.

Note that the annihilation process is statistical. In a large sample of particle-antiparticle bound states, some bound states will annihilate faster, while others slower. The lifetime is the average amount of time we have to wait for around 63% of an initial sample to decay.
 
All those particles decay extremely quickly, about 10-16s for the neutral pion (which cannot decay via the strong interaction), about 10-20s for the J/psi, less for most (all?) other states.
 
Last edited:
Ok, thanks.
 
The pions (or in general the light pseudo-scalar mesons) are protected by the special fact that they are (nearly) Goldstone bosons of the spontaneously broken chiral symmetry of QCD. With massless quarks (i.e. exact chiral symmetry) and QCD only the pseudo-scalar mesons would be exactly massless and stable. Mechanisms for their decay are related to weak interactions and axial anomaly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
13K