Quick question about spin/parity J^P notation

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jeebs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the J^P notation in particle physics, specifically regarding the decay of kaons into pions. The positive kaon decays into two pions with J^P values of 0+, 1-, and 2+, while the tau decays into three pions, leading to J^P values of 0-, 2-, and potentially 3-. The confusion arises from the interpretation of spin and parity for pions, which are spin-zero particles, and the implications for the J^P values assigned to these decays. The correct understanding is that the parity of the pions and their combinations leads to the established J^P values, clarifying the apparent contradictions in the initial reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of particle physics concepts, particularly spin and parity.
  • Familiarity with J^P notation and its significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of meson decay processes, specifically kaons and pions.
  • Basic grasp of quark-antiquark pair dynamics and their implications for particle properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of quantum mechanics related to angular momentum and parity.
  • Explore the decay processes of mesons, focusing on kaon and pion interactions.
  • Learn about the classification of particles based on their J^P values and how they relate to symmetry properties.
  • Investigate the role of quark composition in determining the spin and parity of mesons.
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in meson decay processes and the implications of spin and parity in particle interactions.

jeebs
Messages
314
Reaction score
5
I'm reading something about parity violation where it was initially thought that the positive kaon decaying into 2 pions or 3 pions was actually due to two separate mesons, the tau+ and theta+.

it goes on about assigning them J^P values, where the parity is given by (-1)^J if it's spin is J. it says that the theta+ decayed to positive & neutral pions, so J^P = 0+, 1-, 2+...

i don't get this though.the pion is a quark-antiquark object, right? so it could have a spin of 0.5+0.5 = 1, or 0.5-0.5 = 0. therefore the possibilities for the total spins J of the two decay pions should be 1+1=2, or 1+0 = 1, or 0+0=0, right?
so J=0,1, or 2,
hence P = (-1)^0=1,
or (-1)^1=-1,
or (-1)^2 = 1.

So, this gives J^P = 0+, 1-, 2+ as it says it should.

but then there is the tau to 3 pion decay.
the possible spin values J are 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
1+1+0 = 2
1+0+0 = 1
0+0+0 = 0
so, the tau can have P = (-1)^3 = -1
or (-1)^2=1,
or (-1)^1=-1.
or (-1)^0=1

so surely it should have J^P = 0+, 1-, 2+, 3-, right?
Well it claims that tau has J^P values of 0-, 2-,... so I clearly am missing something. How can you have, say, a J^P = 0- if P=(-1)^0 = 1 ? shouldn't that give you J^P = 0+ ?
I don't even understand what this notation is meant to convey to me anyway.
Can anyone explain this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand all the details of this and I think your reasoning about the spin of pions is not correct. pions are spin zero particles(spins aligned in opposite direction). As I understand, for fermions, particles and antiparticles have opposite parity. so for a pion at ground state(they are not revolving around each other and hence no orbital angular momentum) parity is -1 x 1 = -1. total angular momentum is 0. so jp is 0-. (If you give an internal orbital angular momentum, total angular momentum is 1, and this orbital angular momentum gives an additional parity factor of -1. so for this excited pion jp value is 1+. But we don't need this for kaon decay analysis)
When you have two decayed pions, total spin is 0. Parity is -1 x -1 = +1. so jp = 0+
When you have three decayed pions, total spin is again 0. Parity is -1 x -1 x -1 = -1. so jp = 0-
For a kaon, spin is zero and parity is -1(because particle and antiparticle combination like a pion). so jp= 0-
so a kaon decaying into two pions violate parity.
Someone please correct me if i am wrong.
 
AH yes, my reasoning about the spins of the pions was very wrong. I was thinking if they are a quark-antiquark pair, and each quark has a spin of 1/2, then they could align either both parallel or both antiparallel. to give a magnitude 1 or 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K