What Quantum fields are in the intergalactic space ?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of quantum fields in intergalactic space and the mathematical frameworks that describe these fields, particularly in relation to the Standard Model of particle physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the applicability of quantum field theory (QFT) in different regions of the universe, questioning whether fields known on Earth can be assumed to exist universally. There are inquiries about the nature of the Higgs field and its relation to other quantum fields, as well as discussions on the limitations of observation in outer space.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of the assumptions regarding quantum fields and their universality. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of not being able to observe these fields everywhere, while others provide references for further reading. The discussion has been temporarily closed for moderation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenges of discussing quantum fields without direct observational evidence and the philosophical implications of such assumptions. There is mention of the complexity of the Standard Model and its relation to particle physics, which some find difficult to digest.

NnnTech
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
HIggs
Relevant Equations
E/V
Hello , what quantum fields exist in intergalactic space ?

What math describes these fields ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that the quantum field theory applies wherever. Standard Model is a current standard.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
I think that the quantum field theory applies wherever. Standard Model is a current standard.
I am not sure what the standard model is , I've heard of a Higgs field ?

I am also not sure whether your assumption of QFT applying wherever is correct because we don't/can't observe everywhere assuming an outer space .
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
Higgs field belongs to Standard Model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model.
You say, if we can't observe it we should shut up ? That's a tough philosophy.
I never suggested ''to shut up'' , I would never be so rude ! I just said that fields may or may not apply to wherever . Thank you for the link I will read it over and get back to you with a question maybe .
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Higgs field belongs to Standard Model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model.
You say, if we can't observe it we should shut up ? That's a tough philosophy.
Thank you for the link but it seems wordy and to be describing particle physics . Can you explain it please in your own words ?
 
What people are telling you is that we assume that all quantum fields which are known to exist here on Earth exist everywhere in the universe. These fields are described by the Standard Model.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and NnnTech
phyzguy said:
What people are telling you is that we assume that all quantum fields which are known to exist here on Earth exist everywhere in the universe. These fields are described by the Standard Model.
Our visual universe or universe which are not the same ? We observe a fraction of the universe, so to say these quantum fields exist everywhere in the universe is a falsity . We can describe they exist everywhere within xyzt (space-time) would be more precise and appropriate .
The expansion of space-time possibly relatable to a Higgs field inflation ?
Do we assume that quantum fields of bodies are independent of a HIggs field ?
Do we assume that the electrical neutrality of a Higgs field is a single entity or a combination of elements like an atom?
 
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...

Update -- after a Mentor discussion, the OP has left the building and this thread will remain closed. Thanks folks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
980
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K