What role does doping play in creating n-type and p-type semiconductors?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter PainterGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixing
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of doping in creating n-type and p-type semiconductors, specifically focusing on the effects of adding antimony and indium to germanium. Participants explore the covalent bonding changes that occur during this doping process and the implications for electron availability and hole formation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains that adding antimony to germanium results in an n-type semiconductor due to the presence of an extra electron from antimony's five valence electrons.
  • Another participant questions the logic of indium's bonding with germanium, suggesting that if indium forms three bonds, the fourth bond for the germanium atom remains unaccounted for, leading to confusion about electron deficiency.
  • A participant reiterates the argument about indium's bonding, emphasizing that all electrons are used up and questioning where the deficiency of electrons or holes arises.
  • Another reply clarifies that to add an indium atom, a germanium atom must be removed, which disrupts the bonding structure and leaves one germanium atom without a complete set of bonds, thus creating a situation where there is no deficiency of electrons but a lack of bonding partners.
  • The same participant notes that the actual process of doping likely involves a mixture of germanium and indium, rather than a stepwise addition, and highlights the importance of the ordered structure in a lattice for understanding these interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the bonding implications of adding indium to germanium, with some asserting that no holes are created while others argue that the bonding structure leads to unfulfilled covalent bonds. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of electron deficiency in this context.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities of covalent bonding in semiconductor doping, including assumptions about atomic arrangements and the implications of lattice structures. There are unresolved aspects regarding the specific mechanisms of how doping alters electron availability.

PainterGuy
Messages
938
Reaction score
73
hi everyone,

when antimony is added to germanium, antimony's atoms make covalent bonds with germanium. antimony has five valence electrons and germanium has four. there would be total 4 covalent bonds each consisting of 2 electrons. this would mean that there would be one extra from each antimony's atom hence only four electrons are used to make covalent bonds with germanium atoms. that's what n-type semiconductor is.

now suppose indium, with three valence electrons, is added to germanium atoms. before indium was added to germanium, atoms of germanium were covalently bonded to each other. each atom of germanium making 4 covalent bonds with other germanium atoms. now when indium is added, three out four covalent bonds of each germanium atom will break to form new covalent bonds with indium atoms because indium has only three valence electrons to form three covalent bonds. you see there is still one covalent bond remaining for each germanium atoms, which means all the electrons are used up. no electron is free and neither there is any deficiency of electrons. in other words no holes are there. where am i going wrong? any idea. any help would be welcome.

cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Indium atom is surrounded by 4 Ge atoms. You say that 3 of them will form covalent bonds with the In atom. Good. Then you say that the 4-th Ge atom will have 4 covalent bonds. Now with whom will form this 4-th germanium atoms the fourth covalent bond?
Imagine that Germanium atom surrounded by 3 other Ge and one In. The In is already bound to its maximum capacity.
 
thank you.

now suppose indium, with three valence electrons, is added to germanium atoms. before indium was added to germanium, atoms of germanium were covalently bonded to each other. each atom of germanium making 4 covalent bonds with other germanium atoms. now when indium is added, three out four covalent bonds of each germanium atom will break to form new covalent bonds with indium atoms because indium has only three valence electrons to form three covalent bonds. you see there is still one covalent bond remaining for each germanium atom, which means all the electrons are used up. no electron is free and neither there is any deficiency of electrons. in other words no holes are there. where am i going wrong? any idea. any help would be welcome.

i have boldfaced the parts which are important in my view. you see indium has formed as many bonds as it can. and germanium still has four covalent bonds (three with indium atoms, and one with other germanium atom). so where is any deficiency of electrons? please show me the light.
 
painterguy said:
thank you.

now suppose indium, with three valence electrons, is added to germanium atoms. before indium was added to germanium, atoms of germanium were covalently bonded to each other. each atom of germanium making 4 covalent bonds with other germanium atoms. now when indium is added, three out four covalent bonds of each germanium atom will break to form new covalent bonds with indium atoms because indium has only three valence electrons to form three covalent bonds. you see there is still one covalent bond remaining for each germanium atom, which means all the electrons are used up. no electron is free and neither there is any deficiency of electrons. in other words no holes are there. where am i going wrong? any idea. any help would be welcome.

i have boldfaced the parts which are important in my view. you see indium has formed as many bonds as it can. and germanium still has four covalent bonds (three with indium atoms, and one with other germanium atom). so where is any deficiency of electrons? please show me the light.

In order to add the indium atom you have to remove one Ge atom. This will break 4 covalent bonds - the ones between this Ge atom and its neighbors. Then you put the In and restore 3 bonds. If you try to draw a diagram you'll see that one Ge atom has nobody to bind with through his 4-th electron. Not because there is a deficiency of electrons but because there is no neighbor in the right position do do it.


In reality this is not done in this order. More likely that the material is grown as a mixture of Ge and In. But I hope you get the idea.

The solid is an ordered structure. The atoms have to occupy specific places in a lattice.
There are cases when you can have interstitial impurities - the foreign atoms go in the spaces between the host atoms. In impurities in Ge is not such a case from what I know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K