What should I expect from a history book?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OAQfirst
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book History
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of engaging with the textbook "World History in Brief" 6th ed by Peter N. Stearns in a World Civilization class. Participants express frustration with the book's non-interactive format, lacking exercises and practical applications, which contrasts sharply with their experiences in more interactive subjects like economics. They emphasize the importance of vocabulary comprehension and suggest using the history book as a reference to enhance understanding through lectures and independent research. Overall, the consensus is that traditional history textbooks often fail to engage students effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of academic textbook formats
  • Familiarity with historical inquiry methods
  • Basic knowledge of vocabulary acquisition techniques
  • Experience with interactive learning tools in other subjects
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore alternative history books that incorporate interactive elements
  • Research effective vocabulary learning strategies for historical texts
  • Investigate methods for integrating lecture content with textbook material
  • Learn about supplementary resources for historical inquiry, such as documentaries and online courses
USEFUL FOR

Students in history courses, educators seeking to enhance textbook engagement, and anyone interested in improving their understanding of historical contexts through interactive learning methods.

OAQfirst
Messages
23
Reaction score
3
In my World Civilization class, I'm reading "World History in Brief" 6th ed, by Peter N. Stearns. I read chapter after chapter, but I don't feel like I'm absorbing anything. I believe it's because the book is non-interactive; there are no exercises. There are some "key questions" in some chapters. But other than that, I'm just reading. Is this typical for academic or college level history books? Amazon.com readers have left some positive reviews, but I'm skeptical. My economics book, by contrast, is filled with problems and questions. I feel like I'm really getting something out of this book, and economics is the least interesting course to me. I loathe the terminology, yet I can apply it to the world around me and am starting to make some sense of what I read in business articles. I don't feel like I'm getting that out of this history book.

What are your thoughts about any of your history books from school?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know what you mean. I'm taking my first polysci class this year and reading a textbook about politics and government is def. a change of pace from doing organic chem...what i found helpful is to make sure that I know the vocabulary and for some reason, just by knowing the vocab. i was able to start making the connections...
 
Yes, the non-math and science courses don't have problems in the books (economics is still math-based, so has problem sets). I never learned much from history textbooks, and most of what I've learned about history came AFTER my school years when I found other books that were more interesting or looked up things online as questions arose.

I wouldn't try to just "read" it. Use it more as a reference to fill in details from lectures. I don't know how your class is taught, but my history classes all focused on "Who, What, Where, When," while I was craving answers to "Why and How?" Maybe you just need to try asking yourself the questions you crave? When I reached that stage, and sought those answers from other sources on my own, I was much more interested in history.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K