What Steps Are Needed to Determine the Mass in a Spring Oscillation Problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the mass of a block attached to a spring undergoing simple harmonic motion, given specific parameters such as spring constant, amplitude, and speed at a certain position. The subject area includes concepts from mechanics and oscillatory motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster and a friend attempted to use energy conservation principles to relate the spring's potential energy to the block's kinetic energy, but encountered difficulties with the mass variable. They questioned the validity of their setup when they noticed that mass terms would cancel out.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to the problem, including energy equations and graphical analysis. Some guidance has been offered regarding the setup of equations, but there is no clear consensus on the next steps or resolution of the issue.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about their mathematical representations and the implications of their equations, indicating a potential gap in understanding the relationship between mass, energy, and motion in this context.

JeremyStudent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A block of unknown mass is attached to a spring with a spring constant of 6.5 N/m and undergoes simple harmonic motion with an amplitude of 10 cm. when the block is halfway between its equilibrium position and the end point, its speed is measured to be 30 cm/s. Find the mass of the block, the period of motion, and the maximum acceleration of the block/b]

Me and my friend have been stuck on this problem for a while now, we went into thinking it was going to be easy, only to find ourselves rather stumped, we tried using energy to solve an equation with mass in it, but absolutely failed, if anyone could point us in the right direction it would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you try? Call the mass "m" and consider the total energy when at the point in question.
 
I don't know how to write the equations the way I see on other posts, so you'll have to bear with me.

Basically, we solved the energy using 1/2kA^2 then set an energy equation with m in it equal to our result. however as soon as we set it up, we saw that it made no sense since the m's would cancel out (m * k/m). After that we tried applying what we knew about the graphs (velocity, position), but that didn't get us anywhere either.
 
JeremyStudent said:
I don't know how to write the equations the way I see on other posts, so you'll have to bear with me.
Don't worry about using the fancy equation format, just type them in.

Basically, we solved the energy using 1/2kA^2 then set an energy equation with m in it equal to our result.
Sounds good to me.

however as soon as we set it up, we saw that it made no sense since the m's would cancel out (m * k/m).
Show exactly what you did.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K