What substance is god/gods made of?

[neurocomp2003]

well if god/s exist out side the human realm...then how do humans believe they can communicate with them as to what i remember communication of our kind exists in our realm.

What I'm getting at is if people believe in god/s...and that he exists in some form...doesn't he have to exist in some type of substance away from empty space.

 

[comwiz72]

i think philip pullman's dark matter / consciousness is a freaky idea...

"dust"y eh...

I agree with poster who mentioned a 2D body observing a 3D one, the 2d body cannot comprehend the 3rd dimension...

interesting topic indeed.

 

[selfAdjoint]

selfadjoint: any substance...something of a corporeal form. I use the word subtance because I'm not sure what word physicists use to classify both matter/nonmatter. I would use the word material but people associate that with matter. Substance is the only word I've found to describe both but even then somepeople associate it to matter.

Then what does "corporeal" mean? My comments were intended to suggest to you that the unexamined use of terms like substance and corporeal renders all your arguments moot. You are using Aristotelian categories, and they just aren't the way the universe is.

 

[selfAdjoint]

selfadjoint: any substance...something of a corporeal form. I use the word subtance because I'm not sure what word physicists use to classify both matter/nonmatter. I would use the word material but people associate that with matter. Substance is the only word I've found to describe both but even then somepeople associate it to matter.

Then what does "corporeal" mean? My comments were intended to suggest to you that the unexamined use of terms like substance and corporeal renders all your arguments moot. You are using Aristotelian categories, and they just aren't the way the universe is.

Modern physics makes the idea of matter problematical. Tangible things are so because of a long chain of interactions, leading back to things that aren't tangible at all. Some of these interactions depend on things (virtual particles, Fadeev-Popov ghosts) that in some sense don't really exist!

 

[neurocomp2003]

self-adjoint
in 3D graphics...we place objects in an empty world with a position relative to a global position zero...it is these objects that i call substance/objects if i were working at that low of a scale like in QM. Force/MOvement/collisions are all behavioural properties for these objects...whether they have mass or notn depends on the application...but more than likely they are geometries...like meshes /spheres/boxes etc. What word would you apply that would categorize such fundamental objects in physics(if exists fundamental objects in physics). I use the term corporeal to imply some form/shape but i guess i ill-used the word. Because looking at "dictionary.com" it related to the words material/physical/visible...which i guess all have some other form of meaning in physics.

so

 

[sd01g]

I would believe that God is an Artificial Intelligence with an 11th dimension brain, Possibly a brain made of a Quantum singularity in 11 dimensions, Science will achieve this with the square law of technology, Not tied to time and space as we experience it but a more advanced level of living thought.

________________________________________________
We make our own Gods, Science makes them better.

Great speculation. I was wondering if this Great Super Quantum Computer has any physical location and what would be its power source?