1 mm magnetic shield of pure iron same as 1 cm of mu-metal?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of magnetic shielding materials, specifically comparing pure iron and mu-metal in terms of their permeability and thickness for shielding against low-frequency electromagnetic fields (EMF). Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects of magnetic shielding, including mathematical relationships, material properties, and real-world applications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the effectiveness of magnetic shielding is linearly dependent on both thickness and permeability, suggesting that pure iron can be used in thinner layers compared to mu-metal for similar shielding results.
  • Others argue that mu-metal is easier to shape and use, and that a steel box can serve as a cost-effective outer layer to mitigate magnetic interference before reaching the inner mu-metal layer.
  • There is a mathematical inquiry regarding whether a spherical enclosure made of one material can be equivalent to another if the thickness is adjusted according to their permeability ratios.
  • Some participants note the differences in saturation properties between mu-metal and pure iron, indicating that mu-metal may saturate at lower fields while iron remains effective at higher fields.
  • One participant expresses a desire for specific calculations regarding the magnetic field inside a steel enclosure when subjected to external currents, highlighting a lack of prior education on magnetic shielding despite having an engineering background.
  • Another participant questions the implications of having openings, such as windows, in magnetic shielding and discusses the necessity of a completely sealed environment for effective shielding.
  • There are references to the need for further research on electromagnetic shielding and the differences between electric field and magnetic field shielding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the equivalence of pure iron and mu-metal for magnetic shielding, with no consensus reached on the best approach or material. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specific effectiveness of various materials and configurations.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding material purity, field strength, and frequency, which may affect the effectiveness of the proposed shielding solutions. There are also references to specific applications and environments that may influence the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in magnetic shielding, including engineers, physicists, and hobbyists exploring electromagnetic interference and its mitigation in practical applications.

Jonathan212
Messages
198
Reaction score
4
When materials with high permeability are used to shield against low EMF frequencies of the order of 10 Hz, is the effectiveness linearly dependent on thickness and permeability?

In other words, pure iron (mu=200,000) can be 10 times thinner than mu-metal (mu=20,000) for the same result with a complete enclosure like a sphere or cube?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permeability_(electromagnetism)
Had me worried there, as I would have said the relationship was reversed...
Your 'pure iron' figure is for 99.95% iron, hydrogen annealed. Mere 99.8% iron is but~5k.

As I understand it, mu-metal and its kin are easier to shape and hence use. But, a hefty steel box as an outer container is a cost-effective way to mitigate magnetic interference before reaching inner mu-metal layer(s).
Much depends on field strength and frequency, detail outside my experience...
 
What about the math of it? Material A has permeability a, material B has permeability b, is a spherical enclosure made of A the same as one made of B if the thickness of B is a/b times the thickness of A? What value of magnetic field would you measure inside each exposed to a 10 Hz e/m wave?
 
Jonathan212 said:
What about the math of it? Material A has permeability a, material B has permeability b, is a spherical enclosure made of A the same as one made of B if the thickness of B is a/b times the thickness of A? What value of magnetic field would you measure inside each exposed to a 10 Hz e/m wave?
I'm not familiar with the "pure iron" example you gave earlier. In our products, we generally use mu-metal shields, sometimes with the netic/co-netic combination to optimize the shielding properties.

Check out the Shielding Tutorials at this website below (we use them for most of our magnetic shielding needs). Click the "ALL ABOUT SHIELDING" link at the top of that web page to get to the long list of their tutorial pages. :smile:

http://www.magnetic-shield.com/index.html
241919
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213
You’ve reversed mu for iron and mu-metal. They are not equivalent because mu-metal saturates at low ambient fields. Iron is less effective at low fields but remains effective at much higher fields.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jonathan212 and berkeman
I was starting with the wikipedia values for mu that go like this:
Iron (99.95% pure Fe annealed in H)200000
Mu-metal50000
Iron (99.8% pure)5000

So, nothing reversed. The lack of equivalence sort of answers the question.

All options are open though, the above are just examples. Now what sort of frequencies and intensities are we up against as civilians in cities, where magnetic shielding is relevant?
 
Well I learned something, I never saw that value before. The answer is yes, you can use a thinner sheet of higher mu material so long as it doesn't saturate in the applied field. If it does, then thicker lower mu material will be more effective.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213
Jonathan212 said:
Now what sort of frequencies and intensities are we up against as civilians in cities, where magnetic shielding is relevant?
Can you clarify this? What are you wanting to shield from magnetic fields, and what are the sources of the fields.
 
Oopsa. Didn't get a notification by email for these later posts. I want to shield a bedroom. Sources would be mains electricity to begin with. No trains nearby, only traffic. Anything else that could be an issue?
 
  • #10
Jonathan212 said:
I want to shield a bedroom. Sources would be mains electricity to begin with.
That's problematic. You would need to line the walls with steel plates, probably a couple mm thick.
 
  • #11
Is it ok that there is a window?
 
  • #12
Jonathan212 said:
Is it ok that there is a window?
No, I'm afraid not. Any openings will let in B-field...
 
  • #13
No gaps either. You need a door like a bank vault.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #14
How does this relate to Faraday cages having holes?
 
  • #15
What reading have you done about E-field shielding and Faraday cages?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: marcusl
  • #16
And you do understand that low-frequency E-field shielding is different from low-frequency B-field shielding, and those are different from higher-frequency EM shielding, right?
 
  • #17
I’m with Berkeman—you can’t expect us to give you a full education, you’re responsible for your own education and need to research this topic before asking for help. Read up on RF screened rooms (Faraday cages) and magnetic shielding. We can then help clarify a detail or answer a specific question.
 
  • #18
I have a degree in electronic engineering but magnetic shielding was never taught and I never researched the subject myself. I'd like to know some numbers for the B-field inside such an enclosure. A room completely encased in 2 mm steel sheet (99.8% iron, see above) where a 10 A, 60 Hz current flows through a single wire outside the enclosure, 5 cm from the sheet. What B-field amplitude do we expect inside? What DC B-field do we expect inside due to the Earth's magnetic field?
 
  • #19
Jonathan212 said:
I have a degree in electronic engineering but magnetic shielding was never taught and I never researched the subject myself.
How much E&M did you take? At least in my classes, we covered magnetic fields and how they interact with magnetic materials...
Jonathan212 said:
I'd like to know some numbers for the B-field inside such an enclosure.
Did you read through the application notes that I linked to in post #4 yet?
 
  • #20
Almost exclusively microwaves. I looked at that site after my last post (do you work for them by any chance?) and did find a claim that a very thin sheet of a certain material of theirs would reduce the Earth's magnetic field by a factor of 125 or so, but no math is shown. Anyway, a more interesting question is: would it be bad for you if you slept without the Earth's Schumann resonances?
 
  • #21
As an EE, you should be able to calculate the fields from a wire. The Wikipedia article on magnetic shielding shows a calculation for a spherical shield, which will get you in the ballpark. Literature from shielding companies (Amuneal, Vacuumshmelze, etc) will give you more info. I really think you can do your own research if you try.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
964
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
19K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K