What Values of α and β Represent an Extended Canonical Transformation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the values of α and β that allow the transformation equations Q=q^α cos(βp) and P=q^α sin(βp) to represent an extended canonical transformation. The key condition identified for this transformation is PQ' = λpq', where λ is a constant. The user concludes that by applying the small angle approximation for β and setting α to 1/2, the condition simplifies to PQ' ≈ (β/2)pq', establishing a valid condition for an extended canonical transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of canonical transformations in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with small angle approximations in physics
  • Knowledge of differential calculus and its application in physics
  • Basic grasp of transformation equations in classical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of canonical transformations in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Explore the implications of small angle approximations in physical systems
  • Learn about extended canonical transformations and their applications
  • Investigate the role of parameters in transformation equations
USEFUL FOR

Students of classical mechanics, physicists specializing in Hamiltonian dynamics, and anyone interested in advanced transformation techniques in theoretical physics.

Magister
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The transformation equations are:

[tex] Q=q^\alpha cos(\beta p)[/tex]

[tex] P=q^\alpha sin(\beta p)[/tex]

For what values of [itex]\alpha[/itex] and [itex]\beta[/itex] do these equations represent an extended canonical transformation?

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, just for a start, what is the condition for a canonical transformation to be an extended canonical transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got a solution but it doesn't seems very satisfactory

I believe that the condition for a canonical transformation to be an extended canonical transformation is that

[tex] PQ^\prime = \lambda p q^\prime[/tex]

But I am not 100% sure.

Then I do

[tex] PQ^\prime = q^\alpha sen(\beta p)(\alpha q^{\alpha-1}q^\prime cos(\beta p)-q^\alpha \beta sen(\beta p) p^\prime)[/tex]

Now I do the small angle approximation saying that [itex]\beta[/itex] is small. Is this point that I am not sure because the problem statement don't gives any information about this approximation.
However, doing this I get:

[tex] PQ^\prime \simeq \alpha q^{2\alpha -1} \beta p q^\prime - \beta^3 q^{2\alpha} p^2 p^\prime[/tex]

Using

[tex] \beta^3 \simeq 0[/tex]

and

[tex] \alpha=\frac{1}{2}[/tex]

I get

[tex] PQ^\prime \simeq \frac{\beta}{2} p q^\prime[/tex]

At least I get the condition of an extended canonical transformation

Am I thinking right?
Thanks for any suggestion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K