What Values of k Ensure Linear Independence in R^4 for These Vectors?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the values of the constant k that ensure linear independence for the set of vectors in R^4: {(1, 1, 0, −1), (1, k, 1, 1), (4, 1, k, 1), (−1, 1, 1, k)}. The coefficient matrix was set up and partially reduced to row echelon form (REF), revealing expressions dependent on k. The participants concluded that calculating the determinant of a 3x3 matrix derived from the original matrix is a more efficient method than continuing with row reduction. This approach simplifies the process of identifying the values of k that lead to linear dependence.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear independence in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with R^4 and vector notation
  • Knowledge of matrix operations, specifically row echelon form (REF)
  • Ability to compute determinants of matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to compute determinants of 3x3 matrices
  • Study the implications of linear dependence in vector spaces
  • Explore advanced techniques in row reduction and matrix transformations
  • Investigate the properties of linear transformations in R^n
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, educators teaching vector spaces, and mathematicians interested in the properties of linear independence in higher dimensions.

Nathew

Homework Statement


Determine all values of the constant k for which the given set of vectors is linearly independent in \mathbb R^4.
{(1, 1, 0, −1), (1, k, 1, 1), (4, 1, k, 1), (−1, 1, 1, k)}

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So far I set up a coefficient matrix
<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 4 &amp; -1 \\<br /> 1 &amp; k &amp; 1 &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; k &amp; 1 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 1 &amp; 1 &amp; k<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

And tried converting it to REF

<br /> \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 1 &amp; 4 &amp; -1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 &amp; k &amp; 1 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; (-k^2+k-3) &amp; (3-k) \\<br /> 0 &amp; 0 &amp; (5-2k) &amp; (k-3)<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />

I'm not sure if I should keep going trying to reduce this to REF to see which values of k will not work, but it just seems too messy.

Am I approaching this the wrong way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unlikely as it may seem, it looks to me like checking the determinant is as easy or easier than row reduction. If you add the last row to each of the first two rows you get a column with 3 zeros leaving you with one 3x3 determinant, which is easy to just expand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K