I What was expansion speed at the time of the CMB?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the expansion speed of the universe 370,000 years after the Big Bang, specifically the movement of points in space. It clarifies that there is no single "speed" of expansion, as it varies with distance due to Hubble's law. Participants emphasize that while the Hubble parameter can be determined for that time, it does not equate to a specific speed. The conversation highlights the complexity of measuring recession velocities in cosmology. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately interpreting cosmic expansion.
sjordannc
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
To be clear, I'm looking for the speed at which points in space were moving apart from one another in the universe as it existed 370000 years after the big bang, not the Hubble parameter (expansion rate) derived from our current distance within our current time.

Thanks in advance!
 
Space news on Phys.org
Why are you interested in specific 370000 year after bigbang and not current Hubble parameter ?
 
sjordannc said:
the speed at which points in space were moving apart from one another
There is no such thing. The "speed" depends on how far apart the points are.

If you want to know the Hubble parameter at the time you give, that is a single meaningful number, but it's not a speed.
 
sjordannc said:
I'm looking for the speed at which points in space were moving apart from one another
The problem with this is that Hubble's law says that the recession speed is proportional to distance. So we can tell you the Hubble parameter back then, or we can tell you the recession speed of points a specific distance apart, but there is no single recession velocity. Not then and not now.
 
Abstract The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) has significantly advanced our ability to study black holes, achieving unprecedented spatial resolution and revealing horizon-scale structures. Notably, these observations feature a distinctive dark shadow—primarily arising from faint jet emissions—surrounded by a bright photon ring. Anticipated upgrades of the EHT promise substantial improvements in dynamic range, enabling deeper exploration of low-background regions, particularly the inner shadow...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Title: Can something exist without a cause? If the universe has a cause, what caused that cause? Post Content: Many theories suggest that everything must have a cause, but if that's true, then what caused the first cause? Does something need a cause to exist, or is it possible for existence to be uncaused? I’m exploring this from both a scientific and philosophical perspective and would love to hear insights from physics, cosmology, and philosophy. Are there any theories that explain this?
Back
Top