News What was McCain's comment on JFK and the intervention .. tragedy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nuby
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
McCain's comment referencing JFK's assassination as an "intervention" sparked debate regarding its implications. Some participants questioned whether McCain's choice of words indicated a deeper conspiracy theory, especially given his body language during the remark. Others argued that it was likely just a slip of the tongue, emphasizing that "intervention" could refer to events that disrupted JFK's plans rather than suggesting any conspiracy. The discussion concluded with a sentiment that the issue was being overblown, leading to the thread being closed due to off-topic posts.
nuby
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
McCain was referencing the assassination of Kennedy. Now that was in November of 1963, so one has to wonder if Goldwater and Kennedy were already planning debates before either were nominated by their nominating conventions that were not held until the following summer. I have my doubts.

But if that was the only misrepresentation the Republicans had proffered during the election it would have been a remarkable election indeed.
 
I've never heard the JFK assassination called an intervention before. I'm not big conspiracy guy, but when I heard McCain say 'intervention' and watched his body language following the comment... conspiracy theory was my first thought.
 
McCain's slip might be innocent. he makes a lot of them and even has trouble keeping his tongue in his mouth these days.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nuby said:
I've never heard the JFK assassination called an intervention before. I'm not big conspiracy guy, but when I heard McCain say 'intervention' and watched his body language following the comment... conspiracy theory was my first thought.

I only saw it as events that intervened and prevented JFK from following up on this alleged agreement. It was hardly any nod to a conspiracy that I could see.
 
I see no reason to think that it was anything more than a misspeak.
 
russ_watters said:
I see no reason to think that it was anything more than a misspeak.

i agree but how do you mispeak "intervention" from "assassination"??
 
IMO 'much ado about nothing'
 
Since the thread is going off topic, OT posts deleted and thread closed.
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
146
Views
14K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
7K
Replies
46
Views
8K
Back
Top