What will be the order of increasing radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter prakhargupta3301
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Increasing Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the order of increasing atomic radius for Argon (Ar), Potassium ion (K+), and Calcium ion (Ca2+). The initial thought was that effective nuclear charge influences the radius, suggesting Ar has the smallest radius due to its higher nuclear charge. However, the conversation shifts to whether these elements should be considered as single atoms or ions, noting that Argon, being a noble gas, has a different radius type. The conclusion reached is that the actual nuclear charge, represented by atomic numbers, should be used to assess the radius, leading to the final answer being confirmed as C. The importance of understanding the differences in radius types—metallic, Van der Waals, and ionic—is emphasized in the context of this comparison.
prakhargupta3301
Messages
58
Reaction score
1
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
upload_2018-7-11_22-42-9.png

My answer is A.
Because effective nuclear charge would increase in order Ar<K+<Ca2+ and radius would be inverse of that.
However, the answer isn't that. Can you just point me?
Also, can you tell me in this question, do we think of the noble gas and the Ca and K ions as single atomic species or diatomic? Because Ar doesn't exist in single form right? So will be compare metallic radius(for metal ions) and Vander Waal's radius(for noble gas) or ionic radius for all three?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-7-11_22-42-9.png
    upload_2018-7-11_22-42-9.png
    27.2 KB · Views: 740
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need any concept of effective nuclear charge here. Just use the actual nuclear charge (the atomic number). The higher the nuclear charge, the more tightly it will bind to electrons.
 
  • Like
Likes prakhargupta3301
Khashishi said:
You don't need any concept of effective nuclear charge here. Just use the actual nuclear charge (the atomic number). The higher the nuclear charge, the more tightly it will bind to electrons.
So I think C?
Am I correct please tell me.
 
yes
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top