What will music be like in 100 or 200 years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future Music
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
Sign up Log in
66 replies · 8K views
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
8,252
Reaction score
2,666
I often wonder what music will be like in a century or two. In fact I wonder if humans will have anything to do with music, beyond listening. Will we eventually write a program that is the perfect composer? Will all acoustic instruments be abandoned and replaced with electronic ones, or will we even continue to play instruments manually? And what of singing? Will we continue to sing, or will the computer do it better than any human could, some day?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Discussion

I think, yes, there will be music that is as completely computer generated from start to scratch as it can be, but at the same time all the usual "hand-made" music will continue as strong as ever.

If you know any groups of kids (teen-twenties) everyone still plays the guitar, many of them acoustic guitar, and sing, too. The main difference I see because of the electronic's revolution is that today each and every garage band or solo performer can put out their own personal CD, try to sell it, or just pass it out to friends and relatives.

I don't think live performance, and the real human voice will ever go out of fashion. San Diego, at least, has tons of clubs that feature live music.
 
I guess it dependce on if you think computers eventualy will be able to do everything humans do and maby even better.

To create new good music you would need a good AI that understands what people want to listen to, but even then there is no perfect composition so there can be no perfect composer imo.
 
Sorry if this is a bit of a hichjacking of the thread :( But its kind of related.
But I wonder if we will have any real human actors left in 20-30 years or so or if all movies will be 100% computer generated.
 
Azael said:
Sorry if this is a bit of a hichjacking of the thread :( But its kind of related.
But I wonder if we will have any real human actors left in 20-30 years or so or if all movies will be 100% computer generated.

Computer averaged faces are found to be more attractive than real faces.

Computers don't whine and take big paychecks...of course programmers do. :biggrin:

Already the most popular voices are being recorded and digitized for future use in either their original form, or perhaps some computer enhanced or composite form that generates the greatest appeal.
 
As we begin to understand the brain, doesn't it make sense that a computer might one day write the most beautiful music?
 
Ivan Seeking said:
Computer averaged faces are found to be more attractive than real faces.

Computers don't whine and take big paychecks...of course programmers do. :biggrin:

Already the most popular voices are being recorded and digitized for future use in either their original form, or perhaps some computer enhanced or composite form that generates the greatest appeal.


that leads to another more scary thing. If we soon can computer generate environments that look just like the real one without any great expense, how will we ever be able to trust ANYTHING we se on the media.

But about the original topic. How could a computer ever get the skill of someone like bethoven in composing music? Dont we have to identify what made the greats great before we can program a computer to be great?
 
There was a thread posted recently in the Metaphysics & Epistemology forum that touches on this topic tangentially: Can computer music "speak" to us?

In it is a link to an article by Douglas Hofstadter talking about this issue of whether computers can generate music as well as human composers, and apparently they're getting pretty close: http://www.unc.edu/~mumukshu/gandhi/gandhi/hofstadter.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ivan, you're such a futurist! I like these types of questions because they make me use my imagination, but I also think it's kind of depressing how simple things are taken away from humanity and given to computers. I sure hope that something as old (yet still so popular) as music would not be discontinued.
 
I can't think of a single song released in the past ten years which was *really* good... :/
 
moose said:
I can't think of a single song released in the past ten years which was *really* good... :/
Depends on your tastes I guess. If you like rock there's been some good stuff released if you know where to look.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
As we begin to understand the brain, doesn't it make sense that a computer might one day write the most beautiful music?
You play any instruments or write music, Ivan?
 
I agree with Zoob that it wouldn't ever completely fall to comuters. Personally I prefer music with real instruments to electronic music.
Tom Waits has a cult following. He's gotten quite experimental with his music. He utilizes discordance, off tune notes, and that incredibly raspy gravely voice. I don't think he even sings completely on key all the time either though I don't know how to sing myself so it's hard to determine.
 
hypnagogue said:
Depends on your tastes I guess. If you like rock there's been some good stuff released if you know where to look.

Name some :)

I don't mean just "good" songs... I mean spectacular ones.
 
Musical taste has got to be a really subjective thing.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
I often wonder what music will be like in a century or two. In fact I wonder if humans will have anything to do with music, beyond listening. Will we eventually write a program that is the perfect composer? Will all acoustic instruments be abandoned and replaced with electronic ones, or will we even continue to play instruments manually? And what of singing? Will we continue to sing, or will the computer do it better than any human could, some day?
I am kind of partial to classical rock pre ~1972, and maybe stretch it to late 70's or early 80's based on a few exceptions rather than the general rule.

I can't think of "beyond listening" - then it would not be music.

Even computers can't match the sound of certain horns, string instruments, or the human voice. Think if Greg Lake of Emerson, Lake and Palmer, especially side 2 of Tarkus, or side 2 of Brain Salad Surgery.

Of course, one can do some fantastic things with a sythesizer, e.g. Keith Emerson of ELP, Mike Pinder of the Moody Blues, Rick Wakeman of Yes.

I prefer the sound of a good electric bass, or a stand up double bass.

I think a combination of sythesizer, electronic instruments and the electric and bass guitars work well, and I hope they are around for a long time.

I also like chant and chorale.
 
moose said:
Name some :)

I don't mean just "good" songs... I mean spectacular ones.

How many spectacular songs have you heard, period? I can only think of a few songs that I would consider "spectacular"
 
TheStatutoryApe said:
I agree with Zoob that it wouldn't ever completely fall to comuters. Personally I prefer music with real instruments to electronic music.
Yes. Computer music has just become a new type among the others, and I doubt it will push them out and replace them.

If I dug I'm sure I could eventually come up with many quotes from the 1800's predicting the death of drawing and painting with the advent of photography. It never happened, though, because it turns out the measure of a good drawing or painting was never it's literal realism, the forte of the photograph, but always how a given individual artist expresses his/her take on reality. That's never clearer or more interesting than when channeled through the physiological mechanics of the artists own body.

Same with music. It's much more exiting and intriquing to listen to the interplay of, say, Leo Kottke and his acoustic guitars, than it is to hear "perfect" music. You mention Tom Waits. People want more than perfection and beauty, they also want character. I once read Lotte Lenya described as having "an impossibly ugly voice," perfect for the roles she played and music she sang. While I think "ugly" is the wrong word for her voice, it points out that successful music is frequently a matter, not of beauty and perfection, but of the right balance of the sweet and salty, just as we might say it's a matter of the right balance of the loud and the soft, or of fast and slow, or dissonant and consonant.

I can't see it would be easier to write a "character" program for music than to just let it take place in nature. Stuff happens that no one would think of trying to deliberately design. Who would have concieved of, and tried to design, the strange jazz style of Steely Dan lead singer Donald Fagan?
 
zoobyshoe said:
You play any instruments or write music, Ivan?

I studied and played the piano as a kid, but now I just tinker and play a few old songs, now and again.

...never did master the transition from Funeral For a Friend to Love Lies Bleeding.
 
Last edited:
Ivan Seeking said:
I studied and played the piano as a kid, but now I just tinker and play a few old songs, now and again.
When you tried out that past life regression thing you came up as a pianist, and you started a thread in Mind and Brain asking why we enjoy music. Now this thread. I think you may be a musician trapped in the body of an engineer.
 
If I had been good enough...possibly. Music has always been a huge part of my life; which I guess is true with many people. But, it is true all in all that I have the soul of a poet. If I only had the talent. :cry:
 
Last edited:
btw, in my past life regression I was also a quarry foreman, or something, so I wouldn't put too much into that... :biggrin:
 
Ivan Seeking said:
If I had been good enough...possibly. Music has always been a huge part of my life; which I guess is true with many people. But, it is true all in all that I have the soul of a poet. If I only had the talent. :cry:
You might feel very comfortable surrounded by musicians and musical people. When you retire you might try doing tech for a musical theater where they do operas, operettas, and musicals.
Ivan Seeking said:
btw, in my past life regression I was also a quarry foreman, or something, so I wouldn't put too much into that... :biggrin:
That makes sense for the engineering side.
 
moose said:
Name some :)

I don't mean just "good" songs... I mean spectacular ones.
Spectacular is tough. hmm... try this one.
 
This all brings up an interesting point. Most of us seem to have two loves of music. We like to listen, but we also like to sing along, or perhaps play the dinner plate with a knife and fork, tap your foot, or hum. So there is a desire to listen to music, but I think there is also a fundamental human desire [need, want?] to make music. I don't see how a computer could replace this.
 
Music will never be entirely usurped by computers-- of course not. In principle there's no limit to how well a computer could emulate human musical composition and churn out good tunes (and some programs exist that already do an impressive job), but at best I think such things would be complementary to the human element. One thing to point out here as well is that it's probably considerably tougher to create a new style than it is to mimic an existing one, so perhaps humans will still have that market cornered for a good while longer.

Also it's worth pointing out that computer music needn't be limited to synths and all that-- a program could just write up original sheet music to be played by a human group for instance.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
This all brings up an interesting point. Most of us seem to have two loves of music. We like to listen, but we also like to sing along, or perhaps play the dinner plate with a knife and fork, tap your foot, or hum. So there is a desire to listen to music, but I think there is also a fundamental human desire [need, want?] to make music. I don't see how a computer could replace this.
That was another factor I had thought of aswell. People want to be able to express themselves artistically. Considering the sort of resistance you get to automating meanial jobs giving the jobs of artists over to machines would be next to blasphemy.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
This all brings up an interesting point. Most of us seem to have two loves of music. We like to listen, but we also like to sing along, or perhaps play the dinner plate with a knife and fork, tap your foot, or hum. So there is a desire to listen to music, but I think there is also a fundamental human desire [need, want?] to make music. I don't see how a computer could replace this.
You're right. I rescued a brutally abused guitar from the swap meet once because I recognised it was handmade by a guitarmaker (I used to know one who had pointed out all the differences to me.) I glued it back together and still have it. Can't play it, but every now and then I feel the strong desire just to pluck a strings and hear it resonate. I think humans inherently enjoy being able to make sustained tones. I was cleaning an aluminum tube with some acetone the other day and was surprised to hear it start "singing" as I drew the towel along it (much like a finger on the rim of a wine glass). Had to play with that for quite a while.
 
Maybe we only listen due to a desire to make music.

I was just thinking of all of the faux conductors, guitarists, pianists, etc, in the world. Is it possible that we are all pretending that we are making the music?

Funny; when one attends a piano recital in a room full of pianists, guess what everyone's fingers are doing when the best pianists play?
 
hypnagogue said:
Also it's worth pointing out that computer music needn't be limited to synths and all that-- a program could just write up original sheet music to be played by a human group for instance.
That's pretty non-offensive to me, artistically, since people play music composed by other people all the time and it's recognised as being an interpretive endeavor rather than directly creative. Takes just as much talent and creativity to do it in a worthwhile manner.