The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of a white hole colliding with a black hole. Participants agree that while white holes are purely speculative and lack empirical evidence, they are theorized to be the opposite of black holes, potentially neutralizing each other upon collision, akin to matter-antimatter reactions. The Schwarzschild metric suggests that such an interaction would result in energy conservation, leaving behind a remnant energy product. However, the consensus is that white holes cannot exist within the current understanding of physics, as they violate the second law of thermodynamics.
PREREQUISITESAstronomers, physicists, and students of theoretical physics interested in the concepts of black holes, white holes, and their potential interactions.
Tom McCurdy said:are you saying they are the place that the things crushed into a singulatiry would emit from... which would require wormhole or alt univerese?
The hypothetical antithesis of a black hole, a white hole spews matter out. No antigravitational field has been discovered that actually produces this effect, however, so white holes remain purely speculative. One way wormholes could feasibly be generated is as a black hole that is attached to a white hole if they are found to exist.
Mistic said:A present a white hole is only hypothetical, but since a white hole is the exact opposite of a black hole, then if they collided it is likely they would nutralize each other. Kinda like when matter and anti-matter come togather.
Yet Einstein himself vigorously denied their reality, believing, as did most of his contemporaries, that black holes were a mere mathematical curiosity.