Hi,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

In my ignorance of quantum mechanics, which I am trying to address, I had initially assumed that any resolution of the wave-particle duality of photon and electrons led to some sort of common probability equation. Therefore, I am trying to better understand how different dispersion relationships seem to lead to lead to different wave equations and how to interpret the implications. Up to now I had only understood dispersion as a wave attribute within optics, e.g. spectrum spread through a prism due to different propagation velocities, within a given media, associated with each frequency.

[1] [tex] A = A_0sin(kx-wt) [/tex]

Citing equation [1] as a classical starting point for a wave function, which leads to the following equation based on the 2nd derivative and the relationship [tex][c=w/k = f \lambda ] [/tex], where [c] is the speed of light.

[2] [tex] \frac { \delta^2 \Psi}{ \delta t^2} = c^2 \frac { \delta^2 \Psi}{ \delta x^2} [/tex]

So my first question is whether equation [2] is still a valid baseline for light, when being described as a wave and a photon particle within quantum mechanics?

The reason for asking this question is based on the apparent fact that a photon [c=w/k] and a particle have different dispersion relationships. In a pseudo-derivation of Schroedinger’s wave equation, which I won’t detail here, you are led to the dispersive relationship for a free particle of mass [m] that originates with deBroglie’s wavelength equation:

[3] [tex] w = \frac {\hbar k^2}{2m}[/tex]

This is also described as a dispersion relationship, but one which then seems to prevent the previous method, as used for light, of equating the 2nd derivatives with respect to [x] and [t]. However, the equivalent solution to equation [2] has the following form and was described as Schroedinger’s wave equation for a free particle, ignoring the issue of potential energy [V] for the moment.

[4] [tex] -\frac { \hbar ^2}{2m} \frac { \delta^2 \Psi}{ \delta x^2} = i \hbar \frac { \delta \Psi}{ \delta t} = E \Psi [/tex]

As such, I am assuming that equation [4] only applies to particles with rest mass [m] and therefore cannot be applied to a photon. So:

Is there another Schroedinger’s wave equation for photons?

How do I interpret the meaning of equation [3]?

Here is my current assumption, not a statement of fact:

In the case of a photon, the dispersion relationship [c=w/k] corresponds to the propagation velocity equalling the phase velocity [vp], while by re-arranging equation [3], the propagation velocity seems to correspond to the group velocity [vg]:

[5] [tex] v_g = \frac {dw}{dk} = \frac {\hbar k}{2m} [/tex]

On the basis of deBroglie’s wavelength [tex] \lambda = h/mv [/tex] being substituted back into [5]

[6] [tex] v_g = \frac {\hbar k}{2m} = \frac {h}{2m \lambda} = \frac {mv}{2m} [/tex]

I am slightly confused by the 2 in the denominator of [6], which comes from [3] and suggests that [vg =v/2] after the mass [m] is cancelled:

Does the 2 have anything to do with kinetic energy E=mv/2?

Have I just made a mistake?

Is mass [m] subject to relativistic effects, e.g

[tex]E^2=p^2c^2+m_0^2c^4[/tex] ?

Would appreciate correction of any wrong assumptions on my part. Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# What’s Dispersion got to do with Schroedinger?

Loading...

Similar Threads - What’s Dispersion Schroedinger | Date |
---|---|

Insights Interview with Astrophysicist: Adam Becker - Comments | Today at 2:04 PM |

B If electrons are waves, what causes them to change direction? | Mar 12, 2018 |

What is Leakage in terms of quantum computing? | Feb 26, 2018 |

B What happens to things that aren't ever observed? | Feb 25, 2018 |

A Change in the EM field energy due to dispersion of a wave packet | Mar 15, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**