Whats the equation for rotational momentum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the equations for calculating angular momentum, specifically L=Iw for rotational motion about an object's own axis and L=rxP for motion relative to another object's axis. The total angular momentum is the sum of the spin and orbital components, expressed as L_total = L_spin + L_orbital. The moment of inertia (MoI) can be defined about the object's mass center or calculated using the parallel axis theorem, which allows for flexibility in determining angular momentum based on the chosen reference point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum concepts
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia (MoI)
  • Knowledge of the parallel axis theorem
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the parallel axis theorem in detail
  • Learn about the conservation of angular momentum
  • Explore applications of angular momentum in astrophysics
  • Investigate the relationship between linear and angular momentum
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and rotational dynamics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of angular momentum.

toesockshoe
Messages
265
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I'm confused with when to use L=Iw (inertia times angular speed) for momentum and when to use L=rxP (r cross p) for inertia. Can someone please explain to me what each one is?

Homework Equations


Just a conceptual question.

The Attempt at a Solution


Just a conceptual question.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular momentum is always calculated relative to a point, called the origin. The angular momentum is different depending on what point you choose to consider the origin. So let's take the example of the Earth. The Earth spins on its own axis. That produces an angular momentum relative to the center of the Earth of

\vec{L}_{spin} = I \vec{\omega}

But the Earth also is orbiting around the sun. So if we are computing the origin to be the sun, there is an additional term, the orbital angular momentum, given by:

\vec{L}_{orbital} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}

The total angular momentum about the sun is the sum of these two terms:

\vec{L}_{total} = \vec{L}_{spin} + \vec{L}_{orbital}

By picking the center to be the center of mass of the object, you can make the orbital angular momentum zero.
 
stevendaryl said:
Angular momentum is always calculated relative to a point, called the origin. The angular momentum is different depending on what point you choose to consider the origin. So let's take the example of the Earth. The Earth spins on its own axis. That produces an angular momentum relative to the center of the Earth of

\vec{L}_{spin} = I \vec{\omega}

But the Earth also is orbiting around the sun. So if we are computing the origin to be the sun, there is an additional term, the orbital angular momentum, given by:

\vec{L}_{orbital} = \vec{r} \times \vec{p}

The total angular momentum about the sun is the sum of these two terms:

\vec{L}_{total} = \vec{L}_{spin} + \vec{L}_{orbital}

By picking the center to be the center of mass of the object, you can make the orbital angular momentum zero.
oh ok, so basically you use L=Iw if an object is rotating on resect to its own axis and use L=rxp if an object is rotating respect to another objects axis (and if an object does both,,,, rotate on its own axis as well as another object) then you add the two correct?
 
toesockshoe said:
oh ok, so basically you use L=Iw if an object is rotating on resect to its own axis and use L=rxp if an object is rotating respect to another objects axis (and if an object does both,,,, rotate on its own axis as well as another object) then you add the two correct?
Sort of. It depends what you mean by I here. If you are defining I as the MoI about the object's mass centre then yes, you need to add the contribution from the linear motion. Alternatively, you can use the parallel axis theorem to find the MoI about the reference axis, then you don't need to add in the linear contribution. The two methods are equivalent.
 
haruspex said:
Sort of. It depends what you mean by I here. If you are defining I as the MoI about the object's mass centre then yes, you need to add the contribution from the linear motion. Alternatively, you can use the parallel axis theorem to find the MoI about the reference axis, then you don't need to add in the linear contribution. The two methods are equivalent.
hey haruspex, you also replied to my other problem where I asked someone to check my solution to a rotations problem. So in that case, for the r component of the orbital angular momentum be the distance from the point to the center of the stick or would it be from the point to the fixed origin (which was where the center of the stick INITIALLY was)... it would be to where the fixed origin (where the center of the stick INITIALLY was) right?
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K