What's the formula for calculating large exponents?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter slakedlime
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the large exponent 16^198 without a calculator, emphasizing the use of modular arithmetic for efficiency. Participants suggest approximating the value as approximately 2.60469314 × 10^238 and demonstrate methods to find the last two digits using modular calculations. The final result shows that 16^198 is congruent to 96 modulo 100. The conversation highlights the importance of logarithmic approximations and modular techniques in solving large exponent problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions, specifically log_10
  • Basic knowledge of exponentiation and powers of 2
  • Ability to perform calculations modulo a number, such as 100 or 1,000,000
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn advanced modular arithmetic techniques for large numbers
  • Study logarithmic approximations and their applications in calculations
  • Explore binomial expansion and its relevance to exponentiation
  • Practice calculating powers of numbers modulo various bases
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students preparing for assessments, and anyone interested in computational techniques for evaluating large exponents without calculators.

slakedlime
Messages
74
Reaction score
2
[SOLVED] What's the formula for calculating large exponents?

Hi! I came across the following sum and was wondering if there was some kind of formula for solving it:

16^198

Is it some kind of binomial expansion? Do you calculate the last digits first, advancing to the previous ones later?

I can't use a calculator.

Please, please help. Sums like this might come in an assessment exam I'm sitting. Thank you very much!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jozef Javorka
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It wants you to evaluate 16^(198) without a calculator?

Its approximately 2.60469314 \cdot 10^{238}, even with an efficient method it would take an enormous amount of time to evaluate, you sure you don't mean approximate, or find the last 5 digits of it?
 
Yeah it's not actually solving it but I can make a very rough approximation because I happen to remember that log_10(2) is pretty close to 0.3. Keeping this approx figure in your head let's you do quick and nasty power of 2 to power of 10 (or visa versa) conversions without a calculator.

So in this case 16^{198} = 2^{4*198} \simeq 10^{0.3 * 4 * 198}, which gets you an order of magnetude calcuation of 10^238.
 
Last edited:
I can do the approximations, but is there any way to find the last 6 digits? The question asked for both the approximation and the last 6 digits, so I thought perhaps the method would be similar and that there would be a formula.

Does this have something to do with modular mathematics?

Thank you for your help. :)
 
Gib Z said:
It wants you to evaluate 16^(198) without a calculator?

Its approximately 2.60469314 \cdot 10^{238}, even with an efficient method it would take an enormous amount of time to evaluate, you sure you don't mean approximate, or find the last 5 digits of it?

Why would it take an enormous amount of time to evaluate? Just multiply it out...

260469313784369307581244210575049132700967121965465162515478820772032704602251252793805945346545089482145699632555985954917531314614037698451693595794... (Edit I've removed the last load of digits not to make it too easy for you).

Takes fractions of seconds on modern computers.

And yeah, doing it via modular arithmetic is even easier. Because if you want to know the last 6 digits you can just take it mod 1'000'000, so you can just keep knocking off any digits larger than the first 6.
 
Last edited:
Zurtex said:
Takes fractions of seconds on modern computers.

You didn't read the "without a calculator" part, didn't you?
 
Moo Of Doom said:
You didn't read the "without a calculator" part, didn't you?

Well I didn't use a calculator :P

But yeah, it looks like you have to do some clever modular arithmetic, it'd pretty easy mod 10, mod 100 or perhaps even mod 1'000 by hand, but it's a bit of a pain mod 1'000'000.


I'll think on a bit and see if I come up something (certainly nothing that immediately came to mind worked).
 
I would suggest to give the answer in the binary number system :smile:
 
Thank you all for trying. Forget 6 digits. My exam's tomorrow afternoon, so if it'd be easier to find the last two digits without using a calculator, could you guys show me how? I'd just like to have an idea even if I can't answer.
 
  • #10
16^198 = 16^(2*3^2 * 11)

All computations mod 100 below:

16^2 = 256 = 56

16^(2*3) = 56^3 = 16

16^(2*3^2) = 16^3 mod(100) = 96 = -4

16^(2*3^2*11) = (-4)^11 =-2^22

now 2^10 = 1024 = 24

so 2^20 = 24^2 = 576 = 76

2^22 = 2^20 * 4 = 76*4 = 4 ------>

16^198 = -4 = 96
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jozef Javorka
  • #11
Count Iblis said:
2^22 = 2^20 * 4 = 76*4 = 4 ------>
16^198 = -4 = 96

I didn't quite catch that part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jozef Javorka
  • #12
slakedlime said:
I didn't quite catch that part.

Reducing it down to the results rather than the calculations:

16^198 = 16^(2*3^2 * 11)

16^(2*3^2*11) = (-4)^11 =-2^22

2^22 = 4

16^(198) = -4

-4 is the same as 96, mod 100.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jozef Javorka

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K