What's the unitary matrix equivalent to a beam splitter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of beam splitters using unitary matrices, specifically the square-root-of-NOT matrix and the Hadamard matrix. The square-root-of-NOT matrix is defined as A = (1/√2) * [[1, i], [i, 1]], while the Hadamard matrix is defined as H = (1/√2) * [[1, 1], [1, -1]]. Key distinctions include that H^2 equals the identity matrix I, whereas A^2 is proportional to the X gate. The ambiguity in terminology regarding beam splitters is highlighted, with the consensus that the Hadamard matrix is often associated with beam splitting, though phase factors can vary based on experimental setups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of unitary matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with quantum gates, specifically the Hadamard and square-root-of-NOT gates
  • Knowledge of phase shifts in quantum optics
  • Basic principles of interferometry and beam splitting
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical properties of unitary matrices in quantum mechanics
  • Study the applications of the Hadamard gate in quantum algorithms
  • Explore the role of phase shifts in quantum optics experiments
  • Investigate different types of beam splitters and their specific matrix representations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, optical engineers, and anyone involved in quantum computing or experimental quantum optics will benefit from this discussion.

Strilanc
Science Advisor
Messages
612
Reaction score
229
I've seen various different matrices used to represent beam splitters, and am wondering which is the "right" one. Alternatively, are there various kinds of beam splitters but everyone just ambiguously calls them the same thing?

The matrices I've seen are the square-root-of-not-with-extra-phase-factor matrix ##A = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & i \\ i & 1 \end{bmatrix}## here and here, and the hadamard matrix ##H = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 \end{bmatrix}## here.

A major difference between the square root of NOT gate and the Hadamard gate is that ##H^2 = I## whereas ##A^2 \propto X##. Also, if you have a 180-degree phase shift gate ##Z## then ##HZH = X## whereas ##AZA = A^2 e^{i \pi Z/2}##.

Which operation should I be thinking of, when an article says "beam splitter"?
 
I'm no expert but I think the Hadamard matrix is the beam splitter and the phase factor is due to the length of the arm in an interferometer type setup.
 
I also asked this on the physics stackexchange, and the answer there was that it's ambiguous. Typically the splitting will be even (as opposed to a photon being split 90% one way and 10% the other), but the phases may depend on the context (and are easily adjusted by placing half wave plates on one of the paths).
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K