What's wrong with this proof of sin(i)=0?

  • B
  • Thread starter Prem1998
  • Start date
  • #1
148
12
We have,
e^(ix)=cosx+isinx
So, e^(i*i)=cosi+isini
Or e^-1=cosi+isini
Or 1/e + 0*i= cosi+isini
So, cosi=1/e and sini=0
But that's not the value of sin(i) that I found on the internet. These values are not even satisfying cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1.
What did I miss?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
robphy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
5,699
987
We have,
e^(ix)=cosx+isinx
So, e^(i*i)=cosi+isini
Or e^-1=cosi+isini
Or 1/e + 0*i= cosi+isini
So, cosi=1/e and sini=0
But that's not the value of sin(i) that I found on the internet. These values are not even satisfying cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1.
What did I miss?
e^-1=cosi+isini
1/e + 0*i= cosi+isini

On the left, you have the real and imaginary parts of ##e^{-1}##.
So, you should find the real and imaginary parts on the right-hand side.
Since ##\cos(i)=\cosh 1## and ##\sin(i)=i\sinh(1)##
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=cos(i)
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=sin(i)
we have:
##\begin{align*}
1/e + 0i
&= \cosh 1+i (i\sinh 1)\\
&= \cosh 1-\sinh 1\\
&= \frac{e^1+e^{-1}}{2}-\frac{e^1-e^{-1}}{2}\\
&= e^{-1}
\end{align*}##
 
  • #4
lurflurf
Homework Helper
2,432
132
This is ok

We have,
e^(ix)=cosx+isinx
So, e^(i*i)=cosi+isini
Or e^-1=cosi+isini
Or 1/e + 0*i= cosi+isini

This is false
So, cosi=1/e and sini=0

in fact
cosi=cosh1
isini=sinh1
which are both real

But that's not the value of sin(i) that I found on the internet. These values are not even satisfying cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1.
What did I miss?

what value did you find? The correct values I gave above satisfy cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1.
 
  • #5
148
12
This is ok

We have,
e^(ix)=cosx+isinx
So, e^(i*i)=cosi+isini
Or e^-1=cosi+isini
Or 1/e + 0*i= cosi+isini

This is false
So, cosi=1/e and sini=0

in fact
cosi=cosh1
isini=sinh1
which are both real

But that's not the value of sin(i) that I found on the internet. These values are not even satisfying cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1.
What did I miss?

what value did you find? The correct values I gave above satisfy cos^2(x)+sin^2(x)=1.
So, the problem was when I compared both sides considering cosi and sini to be real, right?
One more thing, does the sine of complex numbers have any physical meaning? Just like how the sine of real numbers represents the y-co-ordinate of the point that we reach on a unit circle by rotating throught that angle. Do they mean anything or are they just useless numbers obtained by plugging in complex numbers in the tailer series?
 
  • #6
34,945
11,127
So, the problem was when I compared both sides considering cosi and sini to be real, right?
Right. Cosine and sine are complex in general - only for real arguments they are real.

I'm not aware of physical applications of complex arguments for the sine. Damped oscillations can be described with a complex period in the exponential, but converting that to a sine and cosine does not really help.
 

Related Threads on What's wrong with this proof of sin(i)=0?

  • Last Post
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
36
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Top