When Electric Field is 0 is potential also 0?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the relationship between electric field and electric potential, specifically addressing the misconception that a zero electric field implies zero electric potential. It establishes that while the electric field inside a conductor is zero, the electric potential remains constant throughout the conductor. This means that a zero electric field indicates no change in potential, not necessarily that the potential itself is zero. The potential is defined as the work done per unit charge to move a charge from a reference point to a specific location, and in regions with no electric field, charges can be moved without additional work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electrostatics concepts
  • Familiarity with electric potential and electric field definitions
  • Knowledge of conductors and their properties in electrostatics
  • Basic principles of work and energy in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between electric field and electric potential in conductors
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of electric potential energy
  • Explore the concept of equipotential surfaces in electrostatics
  • Investigate the implications of Gauss's Law on electric fields and potentials
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of electrostatics and the behavior of electric fields and potentials in conductors.

Alex Hughes
Messages
54
Reaction score
13
So here is how my book defined electric potential. If you take a charge, it will have a corresponding electric field associated with it. If you put another charge in that electric field, an electrostatic force will act on it and give it kinetic energy. This kinetic energy can't come from thin air, therefore it has to come from the electric potential energy stored in the charges. To account for electric potential energy, an electric potential is defined. The electric potential is simply the electric potential energy per charge. This made sense to me until I got to a part about conductors. They said the electric potential is constant all throughout the conductor, but inside the conductor the electric field is 0. This doesn't make sense to me. Don't you need an electric field in order for a force to act on a charge which would then give it an electric potential. Without any electric field, how could you possibly have an electric potential? I looked online and everybody said zero electric field just means that the CHANGE in potential will be 0, and possibly could mean the potential is 0 but its not certain. Can somebody please explain to me why this is. I'm really confused. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What if the electric field at a point was a direction and the voltage gradient at that point, specified in volts per metre?
 
Alex Hughes said:
If you put another charge in that electric field, an electrostatic force will act on it and give it kinetic energy.
More generally, the potential at a given location is the amount of work per unit charge that you will have to do to slowly move that charge from a defined reference point to the given location. If the given location is a region with no field then the charge can be moved freely anywhere within that region without any additional work. But if there is a field between the region and the reference point then it takes some work to go through that field. In fact, it takes the same amount of work to get anywhere within the region, but because of the intervening field that amount of work is non zero. Therefore, a zero field implies a constant voltage, not a zero voltage.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alex Hughes
Dale said:
More generally, the potential at a given location is the amount of work per unit charge that you will have to do to slowly move that charge from a defined reference point to the given location. If the given location is a region with no field then the charge can be moved freely anywhere within that region without any additional work. But if there is a field between the region and the reference point then it takes some work to go through that field. In fact, it takes the same amount of work to get anywhere within the region, but because of the intervening field that amount of work is non zero. Therefore, a zero field implies a constant voltage, not a zero voltage.
Thanks, that makes sense
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K