When is not necesary to do surface ordering in the non-Abelian Stokes theorem?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the path-ordered exponential P e∮tilde{A} can be expressed as a surface-ordered exponential e∫F under specific conditions, as stated by the non-Abelian Stokes theorem. The theorem requires that the connection A is smooth and that the curvature F is closed, adhering to the Bianchi identities. To prove this equivalence, one must utilize a coordinate system to express both the connection and curvature, applying the properties of the Lie derivative to derive the necessary expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-Abelian Stokes theorem
  • Knowledge of smooth connections in differential geometry
  • Familiarity with curvature forms and Bianchi identities
  • Proficiency in Lie derivatives and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof of the non-Abelian Stokes theorem in detail
  • Explore the implications of smooth connections in gauge theory
  • Investigate the role of Bianchi identities in curvature forms
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Lie derivatives
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and researchers in gauge theory or differential geometry seeking to deepen their understanding of the non-Abelian Stokes theorem and its applications.

andresB
Messages
627
Reaction score
375
Acording to the non-Abelian stokes thoerem

http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0012035

I can transform a path ordered exponential to a surface ordered one.

P e[itex]\oint[/itex][itex]\tilde{A}[/itex]= P eF

where F is some twisted curvature;F=U-1FU, and U is a path dependet operator.So, I have a system where every element of the curvature 2-form F commute with each other, i just have the feeling that it is true that

P e[itex]\oint[/itex][itex]\tilde{A}[/itex]=e∫F (*)

where the RHS is just a ordinary surface exponential.So the questions are

1)is my suposition right?
2) if afirmative how cah i prove that fact?
3) if negative, why? and what properties should have the conection A and/or the curvature F to ensure (*)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
is true?The answer to your question is yes, your supposition is right. You can prove this fact by showing that the non-Abelian Stokes theorem holds for the system you are considering. This theorem states that given a smooth connection A and a corresponding curvature F, one can express the path-ordered exponential P e\oint\tilde{A} as a surface ordered exponential e∫F. In other words, the theorem states that the two expressions are equivalent. To prove this, one can begin by introducing a coordinate system and expressing the connection and curvature in terms of the coordinates. Then, one can use the definition of the exponential and the properties of the Lie derivative to calculate the path-ordered exponential. Finally, once the expression is obtained, it can be shown that it is equivalent to the surface ordered exponential. In order for the non-Abelian Stokes theorem to hold, the connection A and the curvature F must satisfy certain conditions. Firstly, the connection must be smooth, meaning that its components must be continuous and differentiable. Secondly, the curvature must be closed, meaning that the components of the curvature must satisfy the Bianchi identities. These conditions ensure that the path-ordered exponential can be expressed as a surface ordered exponential.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K