When is the Particle at Equilibrium Position?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equilibrium position of a particle described by the function x(t) = 5 cos(3t + 2) occurs when x(t) = 0. This condition is satisfied when 3t + 2 = π/2 + πn, where n is any integer. The solution for t yields negative values, indicating times before t = 0 when the particle was at equilibrium. In practical scenarios, only positive time values are relevant, as they correspond to the motion starting at t = 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of trigonometric functions, specifically cosine.
  • Knowledge of harmonic motion and equilibrium positions.
  • Familiarity with solving equations involving angles and periodic functions.
  • Basic concepts of kinematics and time in motion analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the cosine function and its zeros.
  • Learn about harmonic motion and its mathematical modeling.
  • Explore the implications of negative time solutions in physical problems.
  • Investigate kinematic equations and their applications in real-world scenarios.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts of equilibrium in harmonic systems.

Lengalicious
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Position of particle is given by:
x(t) = 5 cos (3t +2)

At what time after t = 0 is the particle at the equilibrium position?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I understand the equilibrium position to be the point where x(t) = 0 since x(t) is thedisplacement from the equilibrium position is it not? But when i re-arrange for t, i get t = -0.14s, negative? Just doesn't seem right what am I doing wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, the cosine function has an infinite number of 0s and your oscillator returns to the equilibrium position an infinite number of times (assuming it never slows down). Your function is at equilibrium whenever [itex]3t + 2 = {{\pi}\over{2}} + \pi n[/itex] where [itex]n = 0, \pm 1, \pm 2, \pm 3...[/itex]. Each of these values of [itex]n[/itex] gives you a different time where the particle will be at equilibrium. The meaning of a negative answer is simply that .14s in the past, it was at equilibrium.

When you get "realistic" about the problem in real life, however, you simply say that particle begins motion at t = 0 and you don't care about negative times. In fact, if you recall basic kinematics problems with cannons and all that good stuff, you would have had the same problem. Say you dropped a ball off a cliff and wanted to know at what time it would have reached a certain height. The math would tell you that there are 2 times where the ball would have reached that height, one being negative. You start the experiment at t = 0, though, so negative answers are unphysical or uninteresting to you at the least.
 
Omg so obvious when you see it layed out infront of you, thanks a lot for the help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K