MHB When the function is not constant

  • Thread starter Thread starter ghostfirefox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the functions f1 and f2, defined on the set {0,1,...,24}, where f1(k) = k + 1 for k < 24 and f2(k) = k for k < 24, with both functions returning 0 at k = 24. The main inquiry is to determine the largest integer m such that the composite function gi1, i2, ..., im, formed by applying f1 and f2 in sequence, remains non-constant regardless of the selection of indices from {1,2}. Participants note the need for clarity in defining g_{iM}, as it references f_{iM}, which has not been explicitly defined. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the behavior of these composite functions to find the maximum m. Ultimately, the challenge lies in ensuring that the composite function does not simplify to a constant value for any combination of inputs.
ghostfirefox
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let f1, f2: {0,1, ..., 24} → {0,1, ..., 24} be such functions that f1 (k) = k + 1 for k <24, f2 (k) = k for k <24 and f1 (24) = f2 (24) = 0. Let gi1, i2, ..., I am (k) = fi1 (fi2 (... fim (k) ...)) for i1, i2, ..., im∈ {1,2}. Find the largest m for which irrespective of the selection i1, i2, ..., im∈ {1,2} function gi1, i2, ..., I am is not a constant function.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have defined $f_1$ and $f_2$ but to define $g_{iM}$ you refer to $f_{iM}$ which have NOT been defined.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top